Literature DB >> 10543958

A kinetic analysis of the nucleotide-induced allosteric transitions of GroEL.

M J Cliff1, N M Kad, N Hay, P A Lund, M R Webb, S G Burston, A R Clarke.   

Abstract

Single-point mutants of GroEL were constructed with tryptophan replacing a tyrosine residue in order to examine nucleotide-induced structural transitions spectrofluorometrically. The tyrosine residues at positions 203, 360, 476 and 485 were mutated. Of these, the probe at residue 485 gave the clearest fluorescence signals upon nucleotide binding. The probe at 360 reported similar signals. In response to the binding of ATP, the indole fluorescence reports four distinct structural transitions occurring on well-separated timescales, all of which precede hydrolysis of the nucleotide. All four of these rearrangements were analysed, two in detail. The fastest is an order of magnitude more rapid than previously identified rearrangements and is proposed to be a T-to-R transition. The next kinetic phase is a rearrangement to the open state identified by electron cryo-microscopy and this we designate an R to R* transition. Both of these rearrangements can occur when only a single ring of GroEL is loaded with ATP, and the results are consistent with the occupied ring behaving in a concerted, cooperative manner. At higher ATP concentrations both rings can be loaded with the nucleotide and the R to R* transition is accelerated. The resultant GroEL:ATP14 species can then undergo two final rearrangements, RR*-->[RR](+)-->[RR](#). These final slow steps are completely blocked when ADP occupies the second ring, i.e. it does not occur in the GroEL:ATP7:ADP7 or the GroEL:ATP7 species. All equilibrium and kinetic data conform to a minimal model in which the GroEL ring can exist in five distinct states which then give rise to seven types of oligomeric conformer: TT, TR, TR*, RR, RR*, [RR](+) and [RR](#), with concerted transitions between each. The other eight possible conformers are presumably disallowed by constraints imposed by inter-ring contacts. This kinetic behaviour is consistent with the GroEL ring passing through distinct functional states in a binding-encapsulation-folding process, with the T-form having high substrate affinity (binding), the R-form being able to bind GroES but retaining substrate affinity (encapsulation), and the R*-form retaining high GroES affinity but allowing the substrate to dissociate into the enclosed cavity (folding). ADP induces only one detectable rearrangement (designated T to T*) which has no properties in common with those elicited by ATP. However, asymmetric ADP binding prevents ATP occupying both rings and, hence, restricts the system to the T*T, T*R and T*R* complexes. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10543958     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  18 in total

1.  Role of the gamma-phosphate of ATP in triggering protein folding by GroEL-GroES: function, structure and energetics.

Authors:  Charu Chaudhry; George W Farr; Matthew J Todd; Hays S Rye; Axel T Brunger; Paul D Adams; Arthur L Horwich; Paul B Sigler
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Out-of-equilibrium conformational cycling of GroEL under saturating ATP concentrations.

Authors:  Gabriel A Frank; Mila Goomanovsky; Amit Davidi; Guy Ziv; Amnon Horovitz; Gilad Haran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ionic interactions at both inter-ring contact sites of GroEL are involved in transmission of the allosteric signal: a time-resolved infrared difference study.

Authors:  Begoña Sot; Fritzthof von Germar; Werner Mäntele; Jose María Valpuesta; Stefka G Taneva; Arturo Muga
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Stimulating the substrate folding activity of a single ring GroEL variant by modulating the cochaperonin GroES.

Authors:  Melissa Illingworth; Andrew Ramsey; Zhida Zheng; Lingling Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Kinetic analysis of conformational changes of GroEL based on the fluorescence of tyrosine 506.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Hosono; Taro Ueno; Hideki Taguchi; Fumihiro Motojima; Tamotsu Zako; Masasuke Yoshida; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 6.  Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence.

Authors:  Andrew I Jewett; Joan-Emma Shea
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Single-molecule observation of protein folding in symmetric GroEL-(GroES)2 complexes.

Authors:  Yodai Takei; Ryo Iizuka; Taro Ueno; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle.

Authors:  Tomoya Sameshima; Taro Ueno; Ryo Iizuka; Noriyuki Ishii; Naofumi Terada; Kohki Okabe; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Requirement for binding multiple ATPs to convert a GroEL ring to the folding-active state.

Authors:  Eli Chapman; George W Farr; Wayne A Fenton; Steven M Johnson; Arthur L Horwich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Chaperonin genes on the rise: new divergent classes and intense duplication in human and other vertebrate genomes.

Authors:  Krishanu Mukherjee; Everly Conway de Macario; Alberto J L Macario; Luciano Brocchieri
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.