Literature DB >> 18682959

Do clinicians read our reports? Integrating the radiology information system with the electronic patient record: experiences from the first 2 years.

Petter Hurlen1, Truls Østbye, Arne Borthne, Fredrik A Dahl, Pål Gulbrandsen.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine how clinicians adapted to and utilized new routines for accessing radiology reports after the integration of an electronic patient record (EPR) with a radiology information system (RIS). Activity-related data describing the availability and receipt of radiology reports were collected from the EPR and the RIS over a period of 2 years. Twelve percent of the final radiology reports had not been opened 4 weeks after they had been entered into the EPR. For opened reports, the median time after a report was available in the EPR until it was first opened by a clinician was less than 1 h for preliminary reports and less than 4 h for final radiology reports. The use of radiology reports was stable during the second observation year. Some reports were not opened for professional as well as technical reasons. The integrated information systems offered a potential for improving routines related to the transmission of radiology reports. Clinicians did not fully take advantage of this potential in the 2 years after its introduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18682959     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1098-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  20 in total

1.  PACS: the second time around.

Authors:  K Foord
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Evaluation of a hospital picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  S Bryan; G Weatherburn; M Buxton; J Watkins; J Keen; N Muris
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1999-10

3.  Filmless radiology at the Baltimore VA Medical Center: a 9 year retrospective.

Authors:  Eliot L Siegel; Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  The medical community's changing vision of the patient: the importance of radiology.

Authors:  Richard B Gunderman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Analysis of the X-ray work flow in two diagnostic imaging departments with and without a RIS/PACS system.

Authors:  Caterina Mariani; Antonella Tronchi; Luigi Oncini; Osvaldo Pirani; Roberto Murri
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Making preliminary radiographic reports available to referring clinicians: current status.

Authors:  Mervyn D Cohen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Radiology reports.

Authors:  L Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Medical impact of unedited preliminary radiology reports.

Authors:  B L Holman; P Aliabadi; S G Silverman; B N Weissman; L E Rudolph; E F Fener
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Missing clinical information during primary care visits.

Authors:  Peter C Smith; Rodrigo Araya-Guerra; Caroline Bublitz; Bennett Parnes; L Miriam Dickinson; Rebecca Van Vorst; John M Westfall; Wilson D Pace
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Merrill C. Sosman Lecture. The practice of radiology by nonradiologists: cost, quality, and utilization issues.

Authors:  D C Levin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  3 in total

1.  The role of key image notes in CT imaging study interpretation.

Authors:  Shu-Feng Fan; Zhe Xu; Hai-Qing He; Jian-Rong Ding; Gao-Jun Teng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Determinants of frequency and longevity of hospital encounters' data use.

Authors:  Ricardo J Cruz-Correia; Jeremy C Wyatt; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Altamiro Costa-Pereira
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Does improved access to diagnostic imaging results reduce hospital length of stay? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Petter Hurlen; Truls Østbye; Arne S Borthne; Pål Gulbrandsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.