Literature DB >> 21316624

Multi-axial loading micromechanics of the cement-bone interface in postmortem retrievals and lab-prepared specimens.

Mark A Miller1, Amos Race, Daan Waanders, Richard Cleary, Dennis Janssen, Nico Verdonschot, Kenneth A Mann.   

Abstract

Maintaining adequate fixation between cement and bone is important for successful long term survival of cemented total joint replacements. Mixed-mode loading conditions (combination of tension/compression and shear) are present during in vivo loading, but the micromotion response of the interface to these conditions is not fully understood. Non-destructive, multi-axial loading experiments were conducted on laboratory prepared (n=6) and postmortem (n=6) human cement-bone interfaces. Specimens were mounted in custom loading discs and loaded at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° relative to the interface plane where 0° represents normal loading to the interface, and 90° represents shear loading along the longitudinal axis of the femur. Axial compliance did not depend on loading angle for laboratory prepared (p=0.96) or postmortem specimens (p=0.62). The cement-bone interface was more compliant under tensile than compressive loading at the 0° loading angle only (p=0.024). The coupled transverse to axial compliance ratio, which is a measure of the coupled motion, was small for laboratory prepared (0.115 ± 0.115) and postmortem specimens (0.142 ± 0.101). There was a moderately strong inverse relationship between interface compliance and contact index (r(2)=0.65). From a computational modeling perspective, the results of the current study support the concept that the cement-bone interface could be numerically implemented as a compliant layer with the same initial stiffness in tension and shear directions. The magnitude of the compliance could be modified to simulate immediate post-operative conditions (using laboratory prepared data set) or long-term remodeling (using postmortem data set).
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21316624      PMCID: PMC3077568          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  14 in total

1.  Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension.

Authors:  K A Mann; F W Werner; D C Ayers
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Modelling the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements: experimental and finite element methods.

Authors:  V Waide; L Cristofolini; J Stolk; N Verdonschot; G J Boogaard; A Toni
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Comparative finite element analysis of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.

Authors:  M A Pérez; J Palacios
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Fatigue of the cement/bone interface: the surface texture of bone and loosening.

Authors:  D Arola; K A Stoffel; D T Yang
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  Does increased bone-cement interface strength have negative consequences for bulk cement integrity? A finite element study.

Authors:  M A Pérez; J M García-Aznar; M Doblaré
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Global mechanical consequences of reduced cement/bone coupling rigidity in proximal femoral arthroplasty: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  T D Brown; D R Pedersen; E L Radin; R M Rose
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Mechanical influences on tissue differentiation at bone-cement interfaces.

Authors:  N J Giori; L Ryd; D R Carter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Shear fatigue micromechanics of the cement-bone interface: An in vitro study using digital image correlation techniques.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Mark A Miller; Amos Race; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Determination of interfacial fracture toughness of bone-cement interface using sandwich Brazilian disks.

Authors:  J Tong; K Y Wong; C Lupton
Journal:  Eng Fract Mech       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  5 in total

1.  Morphology based cohesive zone modeling of the cement-bone interface from postmortem retrievals.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-05-13

2.  Interface micromechanics of transverse sections from retrieved cemented hip reconstructions: an experimental and finite element comparison.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Sanaz Berahmani; Mark A Miller; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Characterisation of a metallic foam-cement composite under selected loading conditions.

Authors:  Gianluca Tozzi; Qing-Hang Zhang; Colin Lupton; Jie Tong; Teodolito Guillen; Arne Ohrndorf; Hans-Jurgen Christ
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Trabecular level analysis of bone cement augmentation: a comparative experimental and finite element study.

Authors:  Y Zhao; K A Robson Brown; Z M Jin; R K Wilcox
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Mechanical properties of a cemented porous implant interface.

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Rudi G Bitsch; Joern B Seeger; Matthias Cm Klotz; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.