Literature DB >> 15506574

Exploring patient reactions to pen-tablet computers: a report from CaReNet.

Deborah S Main1, Javan Quintela, Rodrigo Araya-Guerra, Sherry Holcomb, Wilson D Pace.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We wanted to study patient receptivity to using pen-tablet computers for collecting data in a practice-based research network.
METHODS: We analyzed exit interviews and field notes collected by trained research assistants as part of a larger Colorado Research Network (CaReNet) study comparing pen-tablet and paper-pencil methods to collect data for the Primary Care Network Survey (PRINS).
RESULTS: A total of 168 patients completed a patient exit interview after completion of the pen-tablet-based survey instrument. Analyses of these brief interviews and field notes indicated that patients had favorable reactions to using pen-tablet computers. The most common barriers were related to glitches in the technology; the voice recognition software was the most problematic, with patients (as well as clinicians) finding this feature to be frustrating.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients were able and willing to use pen-tablet computers for completing forms within busy primary care offices. Increasing patient involvement in practice-based research may be even more practicable through the use of this novel technology, which can allow patient-directed data collection at a single point in time as well as longitudinally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15506574      PMCID: PMC1466707          DOI: 10.1370/afm.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  8 in total

1.  Acceptability of computer assessments among ethnically diverse, low-income smokers.

Authors:  B Bock; R Niaura; A Fontes; F Bock
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1999 May-Jun

2.  Handheld computer use in U.S. family practice residency programs.

Authors:  Dan F Criswell; Michael L Parchman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Utilization of computer technology by family medicine community preceptors in Mississippi.

Authors:  Susan Hart-Hester; Joyce Olutade; Chris Rodgers Arthur
Journal:  J Miss State Med Assoc       Date:  2002-09

4.  Parents as direct contributors to the medical record: validation of their electronic input.

Authors:  S C Porter; M T Silvia; G R Fleisher; I S Kohane; C J Homer; K D Mandl
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Audio computerized self-report interview use in prenatal clinics: audio computer-assisted self interview with touch screen to detect alcohol consumption in pregnant women: application of a new technology to an old problem.

Authors:  Jutta Thornberry; Brinda Bhaskar; Cara J Krulewitch; Barbara Wesley; Michael L Hubbard; Abhik Das; Laurie Foudin; Megan Adamson
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire.

Authors:  L Kleinman; N K Leidy; J Crawley; A Bonomi; P Schoenfeld
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  A comparison of 6 months' compliance of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tenoxicam and naproxen. Use of patient computer data to assess response to treatment.

Authors:  O Nived; G Sturfelt; S A Eckernäs; P Singer
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 8.  The patient-computer interview: a neglected tool that can aid the clinician.

Authors:  John W Bachman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.616

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Practice-based research in primary care: facilitator of, or barrier to, practice improvement?

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Denise M Young; Kate MacGregor; Jodi Summers Holtrop
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Data collection outcomes comparing paper forms with PDA forms in an office-based patient survey.

Authors:  James M Galliher; Thomas V Stewart; Paramod K Pathak; James J Werner; L Miriam Dickinson; John M Hickner
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Electronic data collection options for practice-based research networks.

Authors:  Wilson D Pace; Elizabeth W Staton
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Developing an easy-to-use tablet computer application for assessing patient-reported outcomes in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Erik K Fromme; Tawni Kenworthy-Heinige; Michelle Hribar
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  CARE+ user study: usability and attitudes towards a tablet pc computer counseling tool for HIV+ men and women.

Authors:  Meredith M Skeels; Ann Kurth; Marc Clausen; Anneleen Severynen; Hal Garcia-Smith
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  A unique patient population? Health-related quality of life in adolescent athletes versus general, healthy adolescent individuals.

Authors:  Kenneth C Lam; Alison R Snyder Valier; R Curtis Bay; Tamara C Valovich McLeod
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Patient difficulty using tablet computers to screen in primary care.

Authors:  Rachel Hess; Aimee Santucci; Kathleen McTigue; Gary Fischer; Wishwa Kapoor
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Placing wireless tablets in clinical settings for patient education.

Authors:  Judy C Stribling; Joshua E Richardson
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2016-04

9.  Two complementary personal medication management applications developed on a common platform: case report.

Authors:  Stephen E Ross; Kevin B Johnson; Katie A Siek; Jeffry S Gordon; Danish U Khan; Leah M Haverhals
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Usability of a barcode scanning system as a means of data entry on a PDA for self-report health outcome questionnaires: a pilot study in individuals over 60 years of age.

Authors:  Patrick Boissy; Karen Jacobs; Serge H Roy
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.796

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.