Literature DB >> 10537963

The revised Canadian Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals.

J L Glennie1, G W Torrance, J F Baladi, C Berka, E Hubbard, D Menon, N Otten, M Rivière.   

Abstract

The first edition of the Guidelines for Economic Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals: Canada was published in November 1994. At that time, the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA) was assigned the task of maintaining and regularly updating the Canadian Guidelines. Since their introduction, a great deal of experience has been gained with the practical application of the guidelines. Their role has also evolved over time, from being a framework for pharmacoeconomic research to the point where a wide variety of decision-makers use economic evaluations based on the principles set out in the guidelines as a means of facilitating their formulary decisions. In addition, methodologies in certain areas (and the body of related research literature in general) have developed considerably over time. Given these changes in the science and the experience gained, CCOHTA convened a multi-disciplinary committee to address the need for revisions to the guidelines. The underlying principles of the review process were to keep the guidance nature of the document, to focus on the needs of 'doers' (so as to meet the information needs of 'users') and to provide information and advice in areas of controversy, with sound direction in areas of general agreement. The purpose of this review is three-fold: (i) to outline the process which lead to the revision of the Canadian Guidelines; (ii) to describe the major changes made to the second edition of this document; and (iii) to consider the 'next steps' as they relate to the impact of such guidelines and the measurement of outcomes related to economic assessments of pharmaceuticals in general.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10537963     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199915050-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  22 in total

1.  The Danish approach to standards for economic evaluation methodologies.

Authors:  A Alban; M Gyldmark; A V Pedersen; J Søgaard
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic studies. Recommendations from the panel on cost effectiveness in health and medicine. Panel on cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  J E Siegel; G W Torrance; L B Russell; B R Luce; M C Weinstein; M R Gold
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Using pharmacoeconomic analysis to make drug insurance coverage decisions.

Authors:  A H Anis; T Rahman; M T Schechter
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The emerging government requirement for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  M Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  A radical rupture in the paradigm of modern medicine: conflicts of interest, fiduciary obligations, and the scientific ideal.

Authors:  G Khushf
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1998-02

Review 6.  Data sources for pharmacoeconomic and health services research.

Authors:  B A Else; E P Armstrong; E R Cox
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an application of Fieller's theorem.

Authors:  A R Willan; B J O'Brien
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Are we ready to use cost-effectiveness analysis in health care decision-making? A health services research challenge for clinicians, patients, health care systems, and public policy.

Authors:  E J Power; J M Eisenberg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Managed care pharmacy, socioeconomic assessments and drug adoption decisions.

Authors:  A Lyles; B R Luce; A M Rentz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Providing cost-effective therapy using pharmacoeconomic evaluations: the public sector approach.

Authors:  S Finder
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  11 in total

1.  Pharmacoeconomics and health policy. Current applications and prospects for the future.

Authors:  P E Greenberg; A Arcelus; H G Birnbaum; P Y Cremieux; J LeLorier; P Ouellette; M B Slavin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomics of influenza vaccination for healthy working adults: reviewing the available evidence.

Authors:  Maarten J Postma; Paul Jansema; Marianne L L van Genugten; Marie-Louise A Heijnen; Johannes C Jager; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Using economic evaluations to make formulary coverage decisions. So much for guidelines.

Authors:  A H Anis; Y Gagnon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Information barriers to the implementation of economic evaluations in Japan.

Authors:  Shuzo Nishimura; George W Torrance; Naoki Ikegami; Shunichi Fukuhara; Michael Drummond; François Schubert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Why has the use of health economic evaluation in Japan lagged behind that in other developed countries?

Authors:  Naoki Ikegami; Michael Drummond; Shunichi Fukuhara; Shuzo Nishimura; George W Torrance; François Schubert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments for psoriasis.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Nazrul Islam; Canice Ma; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Economic evaluation of plerixafor for stem cell mobilization.

Authors:  Steven M Kymes; Iskra Pusic; Dennis L Lambert; Martin Gregory; Kenneth R Carson; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  A pilot Internet "value of health" panel: recruitment, participation and compliance.

Authors:  Ken Stein; Matthew Dyer; Tania Crabb; Ruairidh Milne; Alison Round; Julie Ratcliffe; John Brazier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Economic evaluation of the artificial liver support system MARS in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Authors:  Franz P Hessel
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2006-10-05

10.  Are complementary therapies and integrative care cost-effective? A systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Patricia M Herman; Beth L Poindexter; Claudia M Witt; David M Eisenberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.