Literature DB >> 10172935

Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic studies. Recommendations from the panel on cost effectiveness in health and medicine. Panel on cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

J E Siegel1, G W Torrance, L B Russell, B R Luce, M C Weinstein, M R Gold.   

Abstract

This article reports the recommendations of the Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, sponsored by the US Public Health Service, on standardised methods for conducting cost-effectiveness analyses. Although not expressly directed at analyses of pharmaceutical agents, the Panel's recommendations are relevant to pharmacoeconomic studies. The Panel outlines a 'Reference Case' set of methodological practices to improve quality and comparability of analyses. Designed for studies that inform resource-allocation decisions, the Reference Case includes recommendations for study framing and scope, components of the numerator and denominator of cost-effectiveness ratios, discounting, handling uncertainty and reporting. The Reference Case analysis is conducted from the societal perspective, and includes all effects of interventions on resource use and health. Resource use includes 'time' resources, such as for caregiving or undergoing an intervention. The quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) is the common measure of health effect across Reference Case studies. Although the Panel does not endorse a measure for obtaining quality-of-life weights, several recommendations address the QALY. The Panel recommends a 3% discount rate for costs and health effects. Pharmacoeconomic studies have burgeoned in recent years. The Reference Case analysis will improve study quality and usability, and permit comparison of pharmaceuticals with other health interventions.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10172935     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199711020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  62 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of new treatments: efficacy versus effectiveness studies?

Authors:  C Bombardier; A Maetzel
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Socioeconomic evaluation in medicine in Europe. Core economic concepts.

Authors:  K Berger; T D Szucs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The revised Canadian Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  J L Glennie; G W Torrance; J F Baladi; C Berka; E Hubbard; D Menon; N Otten; M Rivière
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Diagnosis related group costs in a regulated environment. A note about their economic interpretation.

Authors:  C Le Pen; G Berdeaux
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Common errors and controversies in pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Authors:  S Byford; S Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of KRAS testing and cetuximab as last-line therapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takeru Shiroiwa; Yoshiharu Motoo; Kiichiro Tsutani
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Jan B Oostenbrink; Marc A Koopmanschap; Frans F H Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Methods for claims-based pharmacoeconomic studies in psychosis.

Authors:  Frank Gianfrancesco; Ruey-Hua Wang; Ramy Mahmoud; Richard White
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Effect of discounting on estimation of benefits determined by hepatitis C treatment.

Authors:  Andrea Messori; Valeria Fadda; Dario Maratea; Sabrina Trippoli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Economic value of using partially hydrolysed infant formula for risk reduction of atopic dermatitis in high-risk, not exclusively breastfed infants in Singapore.

Authors:  Marc F Botteman; Abhijeet J Bhanegaonkar; Erica G Horodniceanu; Xiang Ji; Bee Wah Lee; Lynette P Shek; Hugo Ps Van Bever; Patrick Detzel
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.