Literature DB >> 22435747

Economic evaluation of plerixafor for stem cell mobilization.

Steven M Kymes1, Iskra Pusic, Dennis L Lambert, Martin Gregory, Kenneth R Carson, John F DiPersio.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with high-dose chemotherapy is a preferred treatment for relapsed non- Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients. Estimated failure rates with current stem cell mobilization (SCM) regimens are 5% to 30%. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with plerixafor (G P) is superior to G-CSF alone for SCM in heavily pretreated NHL patients.
OBJECTIVES: To conduct a cost-utility evaluation of G P versus G-CSF as a method for SCM in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common subtype of NHL.
METHODS: A Markov model simulated the care process of DLBCL patients undergoing ASCT using data from the Washington University site of the plerixafor phase III study. Other data and utilities were taken from the literature. Costs were Medicare allowable. Using microsimulation we estimated the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) over the patient's remaining lifetime.
RESULTS: The expected lifetime cost of providing care for DLBCL patients using G P was $25,567 more than G-CSF, but they accumulated 1.74 more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for an ICUR of $14,735 per QALY. In sensitivity analyses this result was robust to clinically relevant changes in assumptions.
CONCLUSIONS: Using G P for SCM in ASCT of patients with DLBCL meets accepted standards of cost-effectiveness, primarily because of its effectiveness in SCM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22435747      PMCID: PMC3650087     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  35 in total

1.  The revised Canadian Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  J L Glennie; G W Torrance; J F Baladi; C Berka; E Hubbard; D Menon; N Otten; M Rivière
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  The role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Mary Lee H Villanueva; Julie M Vose
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2006-07

3.  Costs associated with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient treatment in a Canadian integrated cancer care center.

Authors:  Robert C Lee; Denise Zou; Douglas J Demetrick; Lisa M Difrancesco; Konrad Fassbender; Douglas Stewart
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Rapid mobilization of functional donor hematopoietic cells without G-CSF using AMD3100, an antagonist of the CXCR4/SDF-1 interaction.

Authors:  Steven M Devine; Ravi Vij; Michael Rettig; Laura Todt; Kiley McGlauchlen; Nicholas Fisher; Hollie Devine; Daniel C Link; Gary Calandra; Gary Bridger; Peter Westervelt; John F Dipersio
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Cost-effectiveness of maintenance rituximab treatment after second line therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma in Sweden.

Authors:  Frida Kasteng; Martin Erlanson; Hans Hagberg; Eva Kimby; Thomas Relander; Jonas Lundkvist
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 6.  Rituximab (MabThera) for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  C Knight; D Hind; N Brewer; V Abbott
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells for allogeneic transplantation: comparison of T cell depletion strategies using different CD34+ selection systems or CAMPATH-1.

Authors:  P Dreger; K Viehmann; J Steinmann; V Eckstein; W Müller-Ruchholtz; H Löffler; N Schmitz
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  Rituximab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory stage III or IV follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  A Boland; A Bagust; J Hockenhull; H Davis; P Chu; R Dickson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Impact of mobilization and remobilization strategies on achieving sufficient stem cell yields for autologous transplantation.

Authors:  Iskra Pusic; Shi Yuan Jiang; Scott Landua; Geoffrey L Uy; Michael P Rettig; Amanda F Cashen; Peter Westervelt; Ravi Vij; Camille N Abboud; Keith E Stockerl-Goldstein; Diane S Sempek; Angela L Smith; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of the addition of rituximab to CHOP in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Felicetto Ferrara; Roberto Ravasio
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

View more
  9 in total

1.  Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use.

Authors:  Lauren Veltri; Aaron Cumpston; Alexandra Shillingburg; Sijin Wen; Jin Luo; Sonia Leadmon; Kathy Watkins; Michael Craig; Mehdi Hamadani; Abraham S Kanate
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.414

Review 2.  Concise review: Sowing the seeds of a fruitful harvest: hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.

Authors:  Jonathan Hoggatt; Jennifer M Speth; Louis M Pelus
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  US-Based Drug Cost Parameter Estimation for Economic Evaluations.

Authors:  Joseph F Levy; Patrick D Meek; Marjorie A Rosenberg
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Meloxicam with Filgrastim may Reduce Oxidative Stress in Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells during Mobilization of Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Andrea M Patterson; Shuhong Zhang; Liqiong Liu; Hongge Li; Pratibha Singh; Yunlong Liu; Sherif S Farag; Louis M Pelus
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 5.739

5.  HIF-1α is required for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and 4-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors enhance mobilization by stabilizing HIF-1α.

Authors:  C E Forristal; B Nowlan; R N Jacobsen; V Barbier; G Walkinshaw; C R Walkley; I G Winkler; J P Levesque
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for autologous transplantation - a literature review.

Authors:  Marco Aurélio Salvino; Jefferson Ruiz
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2015-08-19

Review 7.  Mobilized peripheral blood: an updated perspective.

Authors:  Darja Karpova; Michael P Rettig; John F DiPersio
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-12-20

8.  Chemotherapy-based versus chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization (± plerixafor) in multiple myeloma patients: an Italian cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Luca Castagna; Francesco Lanza; Daniele Laszlo; Giuseppe Milone; Luca Pierelli; Riccardo Saccardi; Carlo Lazzaro
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.174

9.  Chemical Stability of Plerixafor after Opening of Single-Use Vial.

Authors:  Jack T Seki; Andrea Bozovic; Roy Lee; Rita Kwong; Eshetu G Atenafu; Anna Xu; Jin-Hyeun Huh
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-08-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.