Literature DB >> 11985488

Pharmacoeconomics of influenza vaccination for healthy working adults: reviewing the available evidence.

Maarten J Postma1, Paul Jansema, Marianne L L van Genugten, Marie-Louise A Heijnen, Johannes C Jager, Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg.   

Abstract

A favourable pharmacoeconomic profile has been well established for influenza vaccination in the elderly. For employers relevant benefits seem to exist for vaccinating healthy working adults to avert absenteeism and related production losses. From a pharmacoeconomic point of view it is relevant to consider whether societal benefits of vaccination for healthy working adults is worthwhile given the costs of vaccination for the community. We searched Medline and Embase using the key words influenza (vaccination) in combination with cost, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, efficiency, economic evaluation, health-policy and pharmacoeconomics. From this primary search, we selected 11 studies concerned with the group of healthy working adults. We reviewed these studies according to several criteria: benefit-to-cost (B/C) ratio;vaccine effectiveness, influenza incidence, number of days of work absence due to illness; and relative cost of the vaccine. Three studies on vaccinating healthy working adults found costs exceeding the benefits (B/C-ratio <1). The remaining eight pharmacoeconomic studies found a B/C-ratio of almost two or more. Cost savings are strongly related to the inclusion of indirect benefits related to averted production losses. After exclusion of indirect costs and benefits of production gains/losses, only one of the eight studies remains cost saving. Considering the available pharmacoeconomic evidence, vaccination of healthy working adults in Western countries may be an intervention with favourable cost-effectiveness and cost-saving potentials if indirect benefits of averted production losses are included. Excluding indirect benefits and costs of production losses/gains, cost-saving potentials are limited. Recent international guidelines for pharmacoeconomic research advise the inclusion of production gains and losses in the preferred societal perspective. Hence, on the basis of the available evidence, influenza vaccination of healthy working adults may be recommended from pharmacoeconomic point of view. Pharmacoeconomics do, however, present only one argument for consideration aside from ethical issues, budgetary limits and psychosocial aspects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11985488     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200262070-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  43 in total

1.  Economic impact of providing workplace influenza vaccination. A model and case study application at a Brazilian pharma-chemical company.

Authors:  E Burckel; T Ashraf; J P de Sousa Filho; E Forleo Neto; H Guarino; C Yauti; B Barreto F de; L Champion
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The socioeconomics of influenza and its control measures. Proceedings of a symposium. Geneva, Switzerland, 5-6 October 1998.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Review of cost-benefit analyses of influenza vaccine.

Authors:  J Perez-Tirse; P A Gross
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  An exercise on the feasibility of carrying out secondary economic analyses.

Authors:  T Jefferson; M Mugford; A Gray; V Demicheli
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  The impact of influenza and influenza-like illness on productivity and healthcare resource utilization in a working population.

Authors:  M Keech; A J Scott; P J Ryan
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  The swine-influenza decision.

Authors:  S C Schoenbaum; B J McNeil; J Kavet
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Cost-effectiveness league tables: more harm than good?

Authors:  M Drummond; G Torrance; J Mason
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in health care professionals: a randomized trial.

Authors:  J A Wilde; J A McMillan; J Serwint; J Butta; M A O'Riordan; M C Steinhoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Guillain-Barre syndrome following vaccination in the National Influenza Immunization Program, United States, 1976--1977.

Authors:  L B Schonberger; D J Bregman; J Z Sullivan-Bolyai; R A Keenlyside; D W Ziegler; H F Retailliau; D L Eddins; J A Bryan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Influenza vaccination.

Authors:  M A Riddiough; J E Sisk; J C Bell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  9 in total

1.  Modeling the economic impact of pandemic influenza: a case study in Turkey.

Authors:  Elcin Yoldascan; Behice Kurtaran; Melik Koyuncu; Esra Koyuncu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  The impact of influenza on working days lost: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Martin Keech; Paul Beardsworth
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Economic appraisal of Ontario's Universal Influenza Immunization Program: a cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Beate Sander; Jeffrey C Kwong; Chris T Bauch; Andreas Maetzel; Allison McGeer; Janet M Raboud; Murray Krahn
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Estimation of the health impact and cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination with enhanced effectiveness in Canada.

Authors:  David N Fisman; Ashleigh R Tuite
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Is a Mass Immunization Program for Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Good Value for Money? Early Evidence from the Canadian Experience.

Authors:  Beate Sander; Chris Bauch; David N Fisman; R Fowler; Jeffrey C Kwong; Allison McGeer; Marija Zivkovic Gojovic; Murray Krahn
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2009-12-17

6.  Intradermal influenza vaccination of healthy adults using a new microinjection system: a 3-year randomised controlled safety and immunogenicity trial.

Authors:  Jiri Beran; Arvydas Ambrozaitis; Alvydas Laiskonis; Narseta Mickuviene; Patrick Bacart; Yvan Calozet; Etienne Demanet; Stephane Heijmans; Paul Van Belle; Françoise Weber; Camille Salamand
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Cost-benefit analysis of influenza vaccination in a public healthcare unit.

Authors:  Giorgio L Colombo; Antonio Ferro; Marta Vinci; Maria Zordan; Giulio Serra
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Net Costs Due to Seasonal Influenza Vaccination--United States, 2005-2009.

Authors:  Cristina Carias; Carrie Reed; Inkyu K Kim; Ivo M Foppa; Matthew Biggerstaff; Martin I Meltzer; Lyn Finelli; David L Swerdlow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Improving seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Melanie Saville; Grenville Marsh; Agnes Hoffenbach
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.380

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.