Literature DB >> 22179980

Does using autograft bone chips achieve consistent bone ingrowth in primary TKA?

Roy D Bloebaum1, Karyn E Koller, Bettina M Willie, Aaron A Hofmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cementless fixation remains controversial in TKA due to the challenge of achieving consistent skeletal attachment. Factors predicting durable fixation are not clearly understood, but we presumed bone ingrowth could be enhanced by the quantity of host bone and application of autograft bone chips. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Did the amount of bone ingrowth exceed the amount of periprosthetic and host bone with the addition of autograft bone chips? (2) Did the amount of bone ingrowth increase with implantation time? And (3) did osteolysis along the porous-coated interface and screw tracts progress with implantation time?
METHODS: We measured the amount of bone in the porous-coated, periprosthetic, and host bone regions in 19 postmortem retrieved cementless primary total knee implants. The amount of bone in apposition to the implant surface, and alternatively lysed bone, was analyzed radiographically to assess the progression of osteolysis.
RESULTS: While bone ingrowth tended to be less than periprosthetic and host bone in all three components, it was only significantly less in the patellar component. Bone ingrowth increased in all three components over time, but progression of osteolysis did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Even after long-term followup, the amount of bone ingrowth did not surpass host bone levels, suggesting the amount of a patient's host bone is a limiting factor in the amount of bone ingrowth achievable for this cementless design. It remains unknown whether compromised osteopenic bone could achieve the amount of bone attachment necessary to provide durable fixation over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22179980      PMCID: PMC3369085          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2214-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  31 in total

1.  Long-term followup of the bone-ingrowth Ortholoc knee system without a metal-backed patella.

Authors:  L A Whiteside
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Evaluation of machining methods for trabecular metal implants in a rabbit intramedullary osseointegration model.

Authors:  Mukund Deglurkar; Dwight T Davy; Matthew Stewart; Victor M Goldberg; Jean F Welter
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.368

3.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Bone ingrowth into dynamically loaded porous-coated intramedullary nails.

Authors:  J P Collier; G A Colligan; S A Brown
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1976-07

5.  Macroscopic and microscopic evidence of prosthetic fixation with porous-coated materials.

Authors:  J P Collier; M B Mayor; J C Chae; V A Surprenant; H P Surprenant; L A Dauphinais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone.

Authors:  J Galante; W Rostoker; R Lueck; R D Ray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone.

Authors:  J D Bobyn; R M Pilliar; H U Cameron; G C Weatherly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Measuring the volume fraction of bone ingrowth: a comparison of three techniques.

Authors:  D R Sumner; J M Bryan; R M Urban; J R Kuszak
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Biologic fixation and bone modeling with an unconstrained canine total knee prosthesis.

Authors:  J D Bobyn; H U Cameron; D Abdulla; R M Pilliar; G C Weatherly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Determining relevance of a weight-bearing ovine model for bone ingrowth assessment.

Authors:  Bettina M Willie; Roy D Bloebaum; William R Bireley; Kent N Bachus; Aaron A Hofmann
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 4.396

View more
  3 in total

1.  Treatment for Wear and Osteolysis in Well-Fixed Uncemented TKR.

Authors:  Leah Nunez; Brandon Broome; Tom Pace; Melinda Harman
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2013-02-11

2.  50 years of scanning electron microscopy of bone-a comprehensive overview of the important discoveries made and insights gained into bone material properties in health, disease, and taphonomy.

Authors:  Furqan A Shah; Krisztina Ruscsák; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 13.567

3.  Finite element analysis of the tibial bone graft in cementless total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Koji Totoribe; Etsuo Chosa; Go Yamako; Hiroaki Hamada; Koki Ouchi; Shutaro Yamashita; Gang Deng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.