Literature DB >> 11959918

Ab initio protein structure prediction on a genomic scale: application to the Mycoplasma genitalium genome.

Daisuke Kihara1, Yang Zhang, Hui Lu, Andrzej Kolinski, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

An ab initio protein structure prediction procedure, TOUCHSTONE, was applied to all 85 small proteins of the Mycoplasma genitalium genome. TOUCHSTONE is based on a Monte Carlo refinement of a lattice model of proteins, which uses threading-based tertiary restraints. Such restraints are derived by extracting consensus contacts and local secondary structure from at least weakly scoring structures that, in some cases, can lack any global similarity to the sequence of interest. Selection of the native fold was done by using the convergence of the simulation from two different conformational search schemes and the lowest energy structure by a knowledge-based atomic-detailed potential. Among the 85 proteins, for 34 proteins with significant threading hits, the template structures were reasonably well reproduced. Of the remaining 51 proteins, 29 proteins converged to five or fewer clusters. In the test set, 84.8% of the proteins that converged to five or fewer clusters had a correct fold among the clusters. If this statistic is simply applied, 24 proteins (84.8% of the 29 proteins) may have correct folds. Thus, the topology of a total of 58 proteins probably has been correctly predicted. Based on these results, ab initio protein structure prediction is becoming a practical approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11959918      PMCID: PMC122890          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.092135699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  An overview of structural genomics.

Authors:  S K Burley
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-11

5.  A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection.

Authors:  H Lu; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-15

6.  Universal similarity measure for comparing protein structures.

Authors:  M R Betancourt; J Skolnick
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Assigning folds to the proteins encoded by the genome of Mycoplasma genitalium.

Authors:  D Fischer; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.

Authors:  W R Pearson; D J Lipman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Functional analysis of the Escherichia coli genome using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm: identification of proteins exhibiting the glutaredoxin/thioredoxin disulfide oxidoreductase activity.

Authors:  J S Fetrow; A Godzik; J Skolnick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.

Authors:  R Sánchez; A Sali
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Computational characterization of moonlighting proteins.

Authors:  Ishita K Khan; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.407

2.  An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Song Liu; Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Protein fragment reconstruction using various modeling techniques.

Authors:  Michal Boniecki; Piotr Rotkiewicz; Jeffrey Skolnick; Andrzej Kolinski
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Fold assessment for comparative protein structure modeling.

Authors:  Francisco Melo; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Discrimination of Native-like States of Membrane Proteins with Implicit Membrane-based Scoring Functions.

Authors:  Bercem Dutagaci; Kitiyaporn Wittayanarakul; Takaharu Mori; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Structural features that predict real-value fluctuations of globular proteins.

Authors:  Michal Jamroz; Andrzej Kolinski; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-02-13

8.  Complete atomistic model of a bacterial cytoplasm for integrating physics, biochemistry, and systems biology.

Authors:  Michael Feig; Ryuhei Harada; Takaharu Mori; Isseki Yu; Koichi Takahashi; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 9.  Reaching new levels of realism in modeling biological macromolecules in cellular environments.

Authors:  Michael Feig; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.518

10.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.