Literature DB >> 29550228

Classifying Injuries in Young Children as Abusive or Accidental: Reliability and Accuracy of an Expert Panel Approach.

Douglas J Lorenz1, Mary Clyde Pierce2, Kim Kaczor3, Rachel P Berger4, Gina Bertocci5, Bruce E Herman6, Sandra Herr7, Kent P Hymel8, Carole Jenny9, John M Leventhal10, Karen Sheehan2, Noel Zuckerbraun4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess interrater reliability and accuracy of an expert panel in classifying injuries of patients as abusive or accidental based on comprehensive case information. STUDY
DESIGN: Data came from a prospective, observational, multicenter study investigating bruising characteristics of children younger than 4 years. We enrolled 2166 patients with broad ranges of illnesses and injuries presenting to one of 5 pediatric emergency departments in whom bruises were identified during examination. We collected comprehensive data regarding current and past injuries and illnesses, and provided deidentified, standardized case information to a 9-member multidisciplinary panel of experts with extensive experience in pediatric injury. Each panelist classified cases using a 5-level ordinal scale ranging from definite abuse to definite accident. Panelists also assessed whether report to child protective services (CPS) was warranted. We calculated reliability coefficients for likelihood of abuse and decision to report to CPS.
RESULTS: The interrater reliability of the panelists was high. The Kendall coefficient (95% CI) for the likelihood of abuse was 0.89 (0.87, 0.91) and the kappa coefficient for the decision to report to CPS was 0.91 (0.87, 0.94). Reliability of pairs and subgroups of panelists were similarly high. A panel composite classification was nearly perfectly accurate in a subset of cases having definitive, corroborated injury status.
CONCLUSIONS: A panel of experts with different backgrounds but common expertise in pediatric injury is a reliable and accurate criterion standard for classifying pediatric injuries as abusive or accidental in a sample of children presenting to a pediatric emergency department.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  child abuse; criterion standard classification

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29550228      PMCID: PMC6019119          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  23 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards.

Authors:  S D Walter; L Irwig; P P Glasziou
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Observational studies of patients in the emergency department: a comparison of 4 sampling methods.

Authors:  Morgan A Valley; Kennon J Heard; Adit A Ginde; Dennis C Lezotte; Steven R Lowenstein
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Random Effects Models in a Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Two Diagnostic Tests Without a Gold Standard.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Sining Chen; Thomas A Louis
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Variability in expert assessments of child physical abuse likelihood.

Authors:  Daniel Martin Lindberg; Christopher John Lindsell; Robert Allan Shapiro
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Long-bone fractures in young children: distinguishing accidental injuries from child abuse.

Authors:  S A Thomas; N S Rosenfield; J M Leventhal; R I Markowitz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Fractures in young children. Distinguishing child abuse from unintentional injuries.

Authors:  J M Leventhal; S A Thomas; N S Rosenfield; R I Markowitz
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1993-01

7.  The Prevalence of Bruising Among Infants in Pediatric Emergency Departments.

Authors:  Mary C Pierce; Julia N Magana; Kim Kaczor; Douglas J Lorenz; Gabriel Meyers; Berkeley L Bennett; John T Kanegaye
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Social Intuition and Social Information in Physical Child Abuse Evaluation and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Heather T Keenan; Lawrence J Cook; Lenora M Olson; Tyler Bardsley; Kristine A Campbell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Humeral fractures without obvious etiologies in children less than 3 years of age: when is it abuse?

Authors:  R T Strait; R M Siegel; R A Shapiro
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  Defining the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): deliberations of an expert panel convened by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Authors:  M Willinger; L S James; C Catz
Journal:  Pediatr Pathol       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct
View more
  4 in total

1.  Who's Watching the Children? Caregiver Features Associated with Physical Child Abuse versus Accidental Injury.

Authors:  Amanda K Fingarson; Mary Clyde Pierce; Douglas J Lorenz; Kim Kaczor; Berkeley Bennett; Rachel Berger; Melissa Currie; Sandy Herr; Sheila Hickey; Julia Magana; Kathi Makoroff; Marcia Williams; Audrey Young; Noel Zuckerbraun
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  External Validation of the PediBIRN Screening Tool for Abusive Head Trauma in Pediatric Emergency Department Settings.

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Amanda K Fingarson; Mary Clyde Pierce; Kim Kaczor; Kathi L Makoroff; Ming Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 1.602

3.  Bias and Objectivity When Evaluating Social Risk Factors for Physical Abuse: of Babies and Bathwater.

Authors:  Daniel M Lindberg
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Social history: A qualitative analysis of child abuse pediatricians' consultation notes.

Authors:  Lenora M Olson; Kristine A Campbell; Lawrence Cook; Heather T Keenan
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2018-10-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.