Literature DB >> 16333618

Prior experience and current goals affect muscle-spindle and tactile integration.

Ely Rabin1, Andrew M Gordon.   

Abstract

We previously have shown that reports of illusory elbow extension from biceps vibration can be attenuated by touching a stationary cue-surface with the index fingertip of a vibrated arm. However, this was not the case if the subject had previously felt genuine motion of the cue-surface without biceps vibration. Two potential explanations for this are that the sense of elbow orientation results from tactile and muscle stretch cues that are integrated based on (1) an awareness of the tactile cue's mobility or (2) specific patterns of tactile and muscle spindle activity resembling the elbow motion during previous interactions with the tactile cue. We tested these hypotheses by comparing how touching the cue-surface attenuated the reports of arm movement during biceps vibration after a demonstration of the cue- surface mobility without involving any elbow motion versus simultaneously touching the cue-surface as it moved and extending the elbow to correspond exactly to the elbow extension illusion during vibration. Touching the cue-surface stopped attenuating the reports of elbow extension during biceps vibration only after experiencing actual cue-surface motion while moving the elbow . This supports the second hypothesis that tactile and muscle stretch feedback that are integrated based on specific patterns of tactile and muscle spindle activity recalled from previous interactions with the tactile cue. We also tested the influence of motor set on the sense of elbow position in this paradigm. We found that even after touching the stationary cue-surface had ceased to attenuate illusory elbow motion during biceps vibration, illusory elbow motion during vibration still could be attenuated. This was possible if the subjects intended to actively use their wrists rather than the elbow to maintain fingertip contact. We conclude that muscle stretch and tactile cues are integrated to locate the arm within a highly specific context associated with tactile and proprioceptive feedback from prior experience and current movement goals.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16333618     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0154-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  61 in total

1.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Quantitative analysis of static strain sensitivity in human mechanoreceptors from hairy skin.

Authors:  B B Edin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Movement-induced gain modulation of somatosensory potentials and soleus H-reflexes evoked from the leg. I. Kinaesthetic task demands.

Authors:  W R Staines; J D Brooke; J Cheng; J E Misiaszek; W A MacKay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Grip force adjustments evoked by load force perturbations of a grasped object.

Authors:  K J Cole; J H Abbs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  An investigation into mechanisms of reflex reinforcement by the Jendrassik manoeuvre.

Authors:  J E Gregory; S A Wood; U Proske
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

Authors:  A M Gordon; G Westling; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Central neural mechanisms of touch and proprioception.

Authors:  J F Kalaska
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Ia afferents of the antagonist are inhibited presynaptically before the onset of a ballistic muscle contraction in man.

Authors:  D G Ruegg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in man.

Authors:  J C Gilhodes; J P Roll; M F Tardy-Gervet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  6 in total

1.  The illusion of changed position and movement from vibrating one arm is altered by vision or movement of the other arm.

Authors:  Masahiko Izumizaki; Mikio Tsuge; Lena Akai; Uwe Proske; Ikuo Homma
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Neuronal activity in monkey primary somatosensory cortex is related to expectation of somatosensory and visual go-cues.

Authors:  Yu Liu; John M Denton; Randall J Nelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Characterizing the effects of amplitude, frequency and limb position on vibration induced movement illusions: Implications in sensory-motor rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jonathon S Schofield; Michael R Dawson; Jason P Carey; Jacqueline S Hebert
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.285

4.  Tactile/proprioceptive integration during arm localization is intact in individuals with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Lisa Muratori; Konstantina Svokos; Andrew Gordon
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Neural Correlates of Switching Attentional Focus during Finger Movements: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  Kristin M Zimmermann; Matthias Bischoff; Britta Lorey; Rudolf Stark; Jörn Munzert; Karen Zentgraf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-14

6.  Balance in Blind Subjects: Cane and Fingertip Touch Induce Similar Extent and Promptness of Stance Stabilization.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Francesco Decortes; Monica Schmid; Oscar Crisafulli; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.