Literature DB >> 10511624

The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

G K Yates1, R H Withnell.   

Abstract

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) are low-intensity sounds recorded in the external ear canal immediately following stimulation by a transient stimulus, typically a click. While the details of their production is unknown, there is evidence to suggest that the amplitude of each component frequency reflects the physiological condition of the corresponding region of the cochlea. Certain observations are at variance with this assumption, however, suggesting that pathology at a basal site within the cochlea might affect the production of emissions at frequencies which are not characteristic for that site. We have recorded click-evoked emissions in guinea pigs using high-pass clicks and found emissions at frequencies which are not present in the stimulus and which could not, therefore, have originated from the characteristic place for those emission frequencies. These new frequencies are, by definition, intermodulation distortion frequencies and must have been generated from combinations of frequencies in the stimulus by non-linear processes within the cochlea. Further processing of the emissions by Kemp's technique of non-linear recovery showed that the magnitude of emissions at frequencies within the stimulus frequency pass-band was approximately the same as that of frequencies not present in the stimulus. We propose that, in guinea pigs at least, most of the click-evoked emission energy is generated as intermodulation distortion, produced by non-linear intermodulation between various frequency components of the stimulus. If this result is confirmed in humans, many of the anomalies in the literature may be resolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10511624     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00108-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

1.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

2.  A longitudinal study of changes in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds in an industrial setting.

Authors:  Antonis Moukos; Dimitrios G Balatsouras; Thomas Nikolopoulos; Pavlos Maragoudakis; Evangelos I Yiotakis; Stavros G Korres; Dimitrios Kandiloros
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Interindividual variation of sensitivity to frequency modulation: its relation with click-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sho Otsuka; Shigeto Furukawa; Shimpei Yamagishi; Koich Hirota; Makio Kashino
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-07

4.  The effect of stimulus bandwidth on the nonlinear-derived tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

5.  Measurements of wide-band cochlear reflectance in humans.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-12

6.  Understanding degraded speech leads to perceptual gating of a brainstem reflex in human listeners.

Authors:  Heivet Hernández-Pérez; Jason Mikiel-Hunter; David McAlpine; Sumitrajit Dhar; Sriram Boothalingam; Jessica J M Monaghan; Catherine M McMahon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-04

8.  Otoacoustic emissions in neonates exposed to smoke during pregnancy.

Authors:  Alessandra Spada Durante; Cristina Moraes do Nascimento; Cristiane Lopes
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.