Literature DB >> 20592157

Screening of urine samples by flow cytometry reduces the need for culture.

Santra Jolkkonen1, Eeva-Liisa Paattiniemi, Pauliina Kärpänoja, Hannu Sarkkinen.   

Abstract

Urine samples constitute a large proportion of samples tested in clinical microbiology laboratories. Culturing of the samples is fairly time- and labor-consuming, and most of the samples will yield no growth or insignificant growth. We analyzed the feasibility of the flow cytometry-based UF-500i instrument (Sysmex, Japan) to screen out urine samples with no growth or insignificant growth and reduce the number of samples to be cultured. A total of 1,094 urine specimens sent to our laboratory for culture during 4 months in the spring of 2009 in Lahti, Finland, were included in the study. After culture, all samples were analyzed with the Sysmex UF-500i for bacterial and leukocyte (white blood cell [WBC]) counts. Youden index and closest (0,1) methods were used to determine the cutoff values for bacterial and WBC counts in culture-positive and -negative groups. By flow cytometry, samples considered positive for UTI in culture had bacterial and WBC values that were significantly higher than those for samples considered negative. The flow cytometric screening worked best when both bacterial counts and WBC counts were used with age- and gender-specific cutoff values for all patient groups, excluding patients with urological disease or anomaly. By use of these cutoff values, 5/167 (3.0%) of culture-positive samples were missed by UF-500i and the percentage of samples that did not need to be cultured was 64.5%. Use of the UF-500i instrument is a reliable method for screening out a major part of the UTI-negative samples, significantly diminishing the amount of work required in the microbiology laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20592157      PMCID: PMC2937741          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00617-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  24 in total

1.  Can urine dipstick testing for urinary tract infection at point of care reduce laboratory workload?

Authors:  H D Patel; S A Livsey; R A Swann; S S Bukhari
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  The use of urinary dipstick tests to exclude urinary tract infection: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrew St John; James C Boyd; Andrew J Lowes; Christopher P Price
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Rapid detection of urinary tract infection--evaluation of flow cytometry.

Authors:  N Gässler; H Paul; M Runge
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.975

Review 4.  Understanding diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves.

Authors:  Anthony K Akobeng
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.299

5.  Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 urine cell analyzer as a screening test to reduce the need for urine cultures for community-acquired urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Shine Young Kim; Young Jin Kim; Sun Min Lee; Sang Hyun Hwang; Hyung Hoi Kim; Han Chul Son; Eun Yup Lee
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine flow cytometer Sysmex UF-1000i in urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Fabio Manoni; Lucia Fornasiero; Mauro Ercolin; Agostino Tinello; Melissa Ferrian; Paolo Hoffer; Sara Valverde; Gianluca Gessoni
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  Enumeration of bacterial cell numbers and detection of significant bacteriuria by use of a new flow cytometry-based device.

Authors:  Hiroshi Okada; Toshiro Shirakawa; Akinobu Gotoh; Yutaka Kamiyama; Satoru Muto; Hisamitsu Ide; Yukio Hamaguchi; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  The Antimicrobial Treatment Strategies (MIKSTRA) program: a 5-year follow-up of infection-specific antibiotic use in primary health care and the effect of implementation of treatment guidelines.

Authors:  Ulla-Maija Rautakorpi; Solja Huikko; Pekka Honkanen; Timo Klaukka; Marjukka Makela; Erkki Palva; Risto Roine; Hannu Sarkkinen; Helena Varonen; Pentti Huovinen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Use of flow cytometry (Sysmex) UF-100) to screen for positive urine cultures: in search for the ideal cut-off.

Authors:  Sara Brilha; Helena Proença; José Melo Cristino; Thomas Hänscheid
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Evaluation of urinalysis parameters to predict urinary-tract infection.

Authors:  Juliana Conrad dos Santos; Liliana Portal Weber; Leandro Reus Rodrigues Perez
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.949

View more
  37 in total

1.  Bacteriuria screening by automated whole-field-image-based microscopy reduces the number of necessary urine cultures.

Authors:  Rosanna Falbo; M Roberta Sala; Silvia Signorelli; Natascia Venturi; Stefano Signorini; Paolo Brambilla
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the Alfred 60/AST device as a screening test for urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Sophie Lahanas; George Stathopoulos; Raymond C Chan; Sebastiaan J van Hal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of significant bacteriuria by use of the iQ200 automated urine microscope.

Authors:  Enno Stürenburg; Jan Kramer; Gerhard Schön; Georg Cachovan; Ingo Sobottka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of BiesseBioscreen as a new methodology for bacteriuria screening.

Authors:  Eleonora Nicolai; Simona Garau; Cartesio Favalli; Cartesio D'Agostini; Enrico Gratton; Guido Motolese; Nicola Rosato
Journal:  New Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Biosensor diagnosis of urinary tract infections: a path to better treatment?

Authors:  Kathleen E Mach; Pak Kin Wong; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 14.819

6.  Rapid and sensitive detection of major uropathogens in a single-pot multiplex PCR assay.

Authors:  B Padmavathy; R Vinoth Kumar; Amee Patel; S Deepika Swarnam; T Vaidehi; B M Jaffar Ali
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Flow cytometry analysis using sysmex UF-1000i classifies uropathogens based on bacterial, leukocyte, and erythrocyte counts in urine specimens among patients with urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Tor Monsen; Patrik Rydén
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid Screening of Urinary Tract Infection and Discrimination of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria by Automated Flow Cytometric Analysis Using Sysmex UF-5000.

Authors:  Seon Young Kim; Yumi Park; Hyunjin Kim; Jimyung Kim; Sun Hoe Koo; Gye Cheol Kwon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Accuracy of Automated Flow Cytometry-Based Leukocyte Counts To Rule Out Urinary Tract Infection in Febrile Children: a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hong Phuoc Duong; Karl Martin Wissing; Nathalie Tram; Georges Mascart; Philippe Lepage; Khalid Ismaili
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Urine flow cytometry as a primary screening method to exclude urinary tract infections.

Authors:  K J M Boonen; E L Koldewijn; N L A Arents; P A M Raaymakers; V Scharnhorst
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.