Literature DB >> 4578974

The range of attractant concentrations for bacterial chemotaxis and the threshold and size of response over this range. Weber law and related phenomena.

R Mesibov, G W Ordal, J Adler.   

Abstract

Attractant was added to a suspension of bacteria (the background concentration of attractant) and then these bacteria were exposed to a yet higher concentration of attractant in a capillary. Chemotaxis was measured by determining how many bacteria accumulated in the capillary. The response range for chemotaxis lies between the threshold concentration and the saturating concentration. The breadth of this range is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. Attractants detected by the same chemoreceptor can have their response ranges in widely different places. Over the center of the response range (on a logarithmic scale), bacteria give similar sized responses to similar fractional increases of concentration, i.e. they respond to ratios of attractant concentration, but the response peaks at the center of the range. The size of the response is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. For a detectable response, a smaller increase in attractant concentration is needed for attractants detected by some chemoreceptors than for attractants detected by others. Although the data are inadequate, it appears that the Weber law may be observed over a wide range of concentrations for some attractants but not for others. In the Appendix we aim to explain some of these results in terms of the interaction of an attractant with its chemoreceptor according to the law of mass action.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4578974      PMCID: PMC2226111          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.62.2.203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  18 in total

1.  [REGULATORY MECHANISMS IN THE BIOSYNTHESIS OF THE ENZYMES OF GALACTOSE METABOLISM IN ESCHERICHIA COLI K 12. I. THE INDUCED BIOSYNTHESIS OF GALACTOKINASE AND THE SIMULTANEOUS INDUCTION OF THE ENZYMATIC SEQUENCE].

Authors:  G BUTTIN
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1963-08       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Studies in the phototaxis of Rhodospirillum rubrum. III. Quantitative relations between stimulus and response.

Authors:  R K CLAYTON
Journal:  Arch Mikrobiol       Date:  1953

3.  Studies in the phototaxis of Rhodospirillum rubrum. I. Action spectrum, growth in green light, and Weber law adherence.

Authors:  R K CLAYTON
Journal:  Arch Mikrobiol       Date:  1953

4.  Quantitative analysis of bacterial migration in chemotaxis.

Authors:  F W Dahlquist; P Lovely; D E Koshland
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1972-03-29

5.  A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis by Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1973-01

Review 6.  Chemoreceptors in bacteria.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-12-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Neural events and the psychophysical law.

Authors:  S S Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Adaptation in a vertebrate retina: intracellular recording in Necturus.

Authors:  F S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The galactose binding protein and its relationship to the beta-methylgalactoside permease from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  W Boos
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1969-08

10.  Chemotaxis toward amino acids in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R Mesibov; J Adler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  103 in total

1.  Quantification of chemotaxis to naphthalene by Pseudomonas putida G7.

Authors:  R B Marx; M D Aitken
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors.

Authors:  T A Duke; D Bray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Response tuning in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  R Jasuja; Y Lin; D R Trentham; S Khan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A nonlinear stimulus-response relation in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  A M Stock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Role of the receptor for bacteriophage lambda in the functioning of the maltose chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  G L Hazelbauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Attractant regulation of the aspartate receptor-kinase complex: limited cooperative interactions between receptors and effects of the receptor modification state.

Authors:  J A Bornhorst; J J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Quantitation of the sensory response in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J L Spudich; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  On the significance of the retention of ligand by protein.

Authors:  T J Silhavy; S Szmelcman; W Boos; M Schwartz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Howard C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Chemotaxis toward amino acids by Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  G W Ordal; K J Gibson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.