Literature DB >> 10498999

Scale of attentional focus in visual search.

P M Greenwood1, R Parasuraman.   

Abstract

The effects of the spatial scale of attention on feature and conjunction search were examined in two experiments. Adult participants in three age groups--young, young-old, and old-old--were given precues of varying validity and precision in indicating the location of a target letter subsequently presented in a visual array. Systematic decreases in the size of a valid precue (toward the size of the target) progressively facilitated both feature and conjunction search, with a greater benefit accruing to conjunction search. Age-related slowing in conjunction search was mitigated by precise (small and valid) precues, presumably because they reduced the need for participants in the young-old group to focus and to shift attention. Nevertheless, this benefit was reduced in the old-old group. The effects of valid location precue size varied with cue-target stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) in a manner that interacted with search difficulty: Effects of cue size developed more rapidly in feature search but more slowly in conjunction search. Finally, when precues were invalid for target location, search was faster with larger sized precues. Thus, in both easy feature search and hard conjunction search, the scale of visuospatial attention modulates the speed of visual search. Furthermore, when the SOA is sufficiently long for cue effects to develop, the ability to dynamically adjust the scale of visuospatial attention appears to decline in advanced age. These results go beyond current models in suggesting that visuospatial attention possesses two dynamic properties--shifting in space and varying in scale--that are deployed independently, depending on task demands.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10498999     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  30 in total

1.  Genetics and visual attention: selective deficits in healthy adult carriers of the epsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; T Sunderland; J L Friz; R Parasuraman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

3.  Specificity of the effect of a nicotinic receptor polymorphism on individual differences in visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Pamela M Greenwood; John A Fossella; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Synergistic effects of genetic variation in nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on visual attention but not working memory.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; M-K Lin; R Sundararajan; K J Fryxell; R Parasuraman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Alexa B Roggeveen; James T Enns; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-15

6.  A search-by-clusters model of visual search: fits to data from younger and older adults.

Authors:  William J Hoyer; John Cerella; Norbou G Buchler
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Selective spatial enhancement: Attentional spotlight size impacts spatial but not temporal perception.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Elizabeth Shen; Mark Edwards
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

8.  Effects of apolipoprotein E genotype on spatial attention, working memory, and their interaction in healthy, middle-aged adults: results From the National Institute of Mental Health's BIOCARD study.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Chantal Lambert; Trey Sunderland; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Attention, psychomotor functions and age.

Authors:  Konrad Wolfgang Kallus; Jeroen A J Schmitt; David Benton
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.614

10.  Age-related frontoparietal changes during the control of bottom-up and top-down attention: an ERP study.

Authors:  Ling Li; Caterina Gratton; Monica Fabiani; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.