Literature DB >> 10495119

Beam-orientation customization using an artificial neural network.

C G Rowbottom1, S Webb, M Oldham.   

Abstract

A methodology for the constrained customization of coplanar beam orientations in radiotherapy treatment planning using an artificial neural network (ANN) has been developed. The geometry of the patients, with cancer of the prostate, was modelled by reducing the external contour, planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) to a set of cuboids. The coordinates and size of the cuboids were given to the ANN as inputs. A previously developed beam-orientation constrained-customization (BOCC) scheme employing a conventional computer algorithm was used to determine the customized beam orientations in a training set containing 45 patient datasets. Twelve patient datasets not involved in the training of the artificial neural network were used to test whether the ANN was able to map the inputs to customized beam orientations. Improvements from the customized beam orientations were compared with standard treatment plans with fixed gantry angles and plans produced from the BOCC scheme. The ANN produced customized beam orientations within 5 degrees of the BOCC scheme in 62.5% of cases. The average difference in the beam orientations produced by the ANN and the BOCC scheme was 7.7 degrees (+/-1.7, 1 SD). Compared with the standard treatment plans, the BOCC scheme produced plans with an increase in the average tumour control probability (TCP) of 5.7% (+/-1.4, 1 SD) whilst the ANN generated plans increased the average TCP by 3.9% (+/-1.3, 1 SD). Both figures refer to the TCP at a fixed rectal normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of 1%. In conclusion, even using a very simple model for the geometry of the patient, an ANN was able to produce beam orientations that were similar to those produced by a conventional computer algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10495119     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/9/312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy with field rotation--a time-varying fractionation study.

Authors:  Delal Dink; Mark P Langer; Ronald L Rardin; Joseph F Pekny; Gintaras V Reklaitis; Behlul Saka
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2012-01-10

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Masoom A Haider; Maryellen L Giger; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Uncertainty incorporated beam angle optimization for IMPT treatment planning.

Authors:  Wenhua Cao; Gino J Lim; Andrew Lee; Yupeng Li; Wei Liu; X Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A data-driven approach to optimal beam/arc angle selection for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Yang Sheng; Taoran Li; Yaorong Ge; Hui Lin; Wentao Wang; Lulin Yuan; Q Jackie Wu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-12

5.  A reinforcement learning application of a guided Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm for beam orientation selection in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Azar Sadeghnejad-Barkousaraie; Gyanendra Bohara; Steve Jiang; Dan Nguyen
Journal:  Mach Learn Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-13

6.  Machine learning and modeling: Data, validation, communication challenges.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Dan Ruan; Gilmer Valdes; Andre Dekker; Todd McNutt; Yaorong Ge; Q Jackie Wu; Jung Hun Oh; Maria Thor; Wade Smith; Arvind Rao; Clifton Fuller; Ying Xiao; Frank Manion; Matthew Schipper; Charles Mayo; Jean M Moran; Randall Ten Haken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Beam selection for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using Cyberknife with multileaf collimation.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Peter Ziegenhein; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  A bias-free, automated planning tool for technique comparison in radiotherapy - application to nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatments.

Authors:  Christopher Boylan; Carl Rowbottom
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology: Opportunities, Requirements, and Needs.

Authors:  Mary Feng; Gilmer Valdes; Nayha Dixit; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.