OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between the relative and absolute coronary blood flow velocity reserve (CFVR) compared with the results of (99m)Tc MIBI single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS: In 37 patients with one vessel disease, (99m)Tc MIBI SPECT was performed before angioplasty, two to three weeks after angioplasty, and at six months' follow up. CFVR was measured distal to the stenosis (dCFVR) as well as in a reference coronary artery before angioplasty, immediately after angioplasty, and at late follow up. Relative CFVR (rCFVR) was calculated as the ratio between dCFVR and CFVR measured in the reference coronary artery. The optimal thresholds for reversible perfusion defects were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The agreement for the full range of coronary artery stenosis (n = 107, mean (SD) diameter stenosis 48 (28)%, range 0-98%) between dCFVR (cut off value 1.9) and rCFVR (cut off value 0.65) with (99m)Tc MIBI SPECT was 81% and 85%, respectively. In intermediate lesions (n = 49, diameter stenosis range 30-75%) the agreement between dCFVR (cut off value 2.0) and (99m)Tc MIBI SPECT was 72%, which increased to 78% using the rCFVR (cut off value 0.65). There was a strong linear relation between dCFVR and rCFVR (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A best cut off value for dCFVR of 1.9 corresponds with a best cut off value of 0.65 for rCFVR, within the full range of coronary narrowings. Intracoronary blood flow velocity analysis could obviate the need for additional myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the majority of patients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between the relative and absolute coronary blood flow velocity reserve (CFVR) compared with the results of (99m)Tc MIBI single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS: In 37 patients with one vessel disease, (99m)Tc MIBI SPECT was performed before angioplasty, two to three weeks after angioplasty, and at six months' follow up. CFVR was measured distal to the stenosis (dCFVR) as well as in a reference coronary artery before angioplasty, immediately after angioplasty, and at late follow up. Relative CFVR (rCFVR) was calculated as the ratio between dCFVR and CFVR measured in the reference coronary artery. The optimal thresholds for reversible perfusion defects were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The agreement for the full range of coronary artery stenosis (n = 107, mean (SD) diameter stenosis 48 (28)%, range 0-98%) between dCFVR (cut off value 1.9) and rCFVR (cut off value 0.65) with (99m)Tc MIBI SPECT was 81% and 85%, respectively. In intermediate lesions (n = 49, diameter stenosis range 30-75%) the agreement between dCFVR (cut off value 2.0) and (99m)Tc MIBI SPECT was 72%, which increased to 78% using the rCFVR (cut off value 0.65). There was a strong linear relation between dCFVR and rCFVR (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A best cut off value for dCFVR of 1.9 corresponds with a best cut off value of 0.65 for rCFVR, within the full range of coronary narrowings. Intracoronary blood flow velocity analysis could obviate the need for additional myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the majority of patients.
Authors: L I Heller; C Cates; J Popma; L I Deckelbaum; J D Joye; S T Dahlberg; B J Villegas; A Arnold; R Kipperman; W C Grinstead; S Balcom; Y Ma; M Cleman; R M Steingart; J A Leppo Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-07-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C W White; C B Wright; D B Doty; L F Hiratza; C L Eastham; D G Harrison; M L Marcus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1984-03-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Liesbeth P Salm; Jeroen J Bax; J Wouter Jukema; Susan E Langerak; Hubert W Vliegen; Paul Steendijk; Hildo J Lamb; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Steven A J Chamuleau; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Martijn Meuwissen; Jan J Piek Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: S A J Chamuleau; B L F van Eck-Smit; M Meuwissen; K T Koch; M G W Dijkgraaf; H J Verberne; J G P Tijssen; J J Piek Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.380