Literature DB >> 9244216

Intracoronary Doppler assessment of moderate coronary artery disease: comparison with 201Tl imaging and coronary angiography. FACTS Study Group.

L I Heller1, C Cates, J Popma, L I Deckelbaum, J D Joye, S T Dahlberg, B J Villegas, A Arnold, R Kipperman, W C Grinstead, S Balcom, Y Ma, M Cleman, R M Steingart, J A Leppo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography may not reliably predict whether a stenosis causes exercise-induced ischemia. Intracoronary Doppler ultrasound may enhance diagnostic accuracy by providing a physiological assessment of stenosis severity. The goal of this study was to compare intracoronary Doppler ultrasound with both 201Tl imaging and coronary angiography. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with 67 stenotic coronary arteries underwent coronary angiography with intracoronary Doppler ultrasound and had exercise 201Tl testing within a 1-week period. Coronary flow reserve was measured, and analyses were performed by independent core laboratories. The mean stenosis was 59+/-12%; 51 of 67 stenoses were intermediate in severity (40% to 70%). A coronary flow reserve < 1.7 predicted the presence of a stress 201Tl defect in 56 of 67 stenoses (agreement=84%; kappa=0.67; 95% CI=0.48 to 0.86). In the patients who achieved 75% of their predicted maximum heart rate, the Doppler and 201Tl imaging data agreed in 46 of 52 stenoses (agreement=88%; kappa=0.77; 95%CI=0.57 to 0.97). Scatter was evident when angiography was compared with coronary flow reserve (r=.43), and the angiogram did not reliably predict the results of the 201Tl stress test (kappa=0.21; agreement=57% to 63%).
CONCLUSIONS: Doppler-derived coronary flow reserve accurately predicts the presence of exercise-induced ischemia on stress 201Tl imaging, and coronary angiography does not reliably assess the physiological significance of an intermediate coronary stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9244216     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.96.2.484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  25 in total

1.  Functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis by doppler derived absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in comparison with (99m)Tc MIBI SPECT.

Authors:  H J Verberne; J J Piek; R A van Liebergen; K T Koch; J M Schroeder-Tanka; E A van Royen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Estimation of coronary flow reserve: can SPECT compete with other modalities?

Authors:  G T Gullberg; E V Di Bella; A J Sinusas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Invasive assessment of the coronary circulation: intravascular ultrasound and Doppler.

Authors:  David E Newby; Keith A A Fox
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  C Anagnostopoulos; M Harbinson; A Kelion; K Kundley; C Y Loong; A Notghi; E Reyes; W Tindale; S R Underwood
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Risk stratification of the normal perfusion scan: does normal stress perfusion always mean very low risk?

Authors:  Seth Dahlberg; Jeffrey Leppo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Coronary physiology assessment in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Felipe Díez-Delhoyo; Enrique Gutiérrez-Ibañes; Gerard Loughlin; Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz; María Eugenia Vázquez-Álvarez; Fernando Sarnago-Cebada; Rocío Angulo-Llanos; Ana Casado-Plasencia; Jaime Elízaga; Francisco Fernández Avilés Diáz
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-26

7.  Myocardial blood flow: Putting it into clinical perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Hellmut Schindler
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Hemodynamic evaluation of saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts: relative merits of Doppler flow velocity and SPECT perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Liesbeth P Salm; Jeroen J Bax; J Wouter Jukema; Susan E Langerak; Hubert W Vliegen; Paul Steendijk; Hildo J Lamb; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Defining the "gold standard": a changing paradigm.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Identification of advanced coronary artery disease with exercise myocardial perfusion imaging: the clinical value of a novel approach for assessing lung thallium-201 uptake.

Authors:  Efstratios Moralidis; Tryfon Spyridonidis; Georgios Arsos; Constantinos Anagnostopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.