Literature DB >> 10482707

Magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately predicts resectability of pancreatic carcinoma.

S N Hochwald1, N M Rofsky, M Dobryansky, P Shamamian, S G Marcus.   

Abstract

Accurate preoperative staging of pancreatic malignancy aids in directing appropriate therapy and avoids unnecessary invasive procedures. We evaluated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in determining resectability of pancreatic malignancy. Twenty-one patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy underwent dynamic, contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRI with MRCP prior to surgical evaluation. Results of this study were correlated with operative results and pathologic findings. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI with MRCP in detecting a mass, determining the nature of the mass, and predicting lymph node involvement and resectability were determined. MRI with MRCP correctly identified the presence of a pancreatic mass in all 21 of these patients. Following pathologic correlation, it was determined that MRI with MRCP was 81% accurate in determining the benign or malignant nature of the pancreatic mass and 43% accurate in predicting lymph node involvement. In predicting resectability, MRI with MRCP had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 83%, positive predictive value of 94%, negative predictive value of 100%, and accuracy of 95%. MRI with MRCP is an accurate, noninvasive technique in the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic malignancy. Information obtained from MRI with MRCP including identification of a mass and predicting tumor resectability may be of value in staging and avoiding unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10482707     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80104-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  13 in total

1.  Spiral CT of the pancreas.

Authors:  D E Dupuy; P Costello; C P Ecker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  M T Keogan; M E Baker
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1995-01

3.  Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preoperative assessment with helical CT versus dynamic MR imaging.

Authors:  T Ichikawa; H Haradome; J Hachiya; T Nitatori; K Ohtomo; T Kinoshita; T Araki
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  CT and MR evaluation of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  D A Bluemke; E K Fishman
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.495

5.  Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.

Authors:  R N Low; R M Barone; C Lacey; J S Sigeti; G D Alzate; C P Sebrechts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging improves the staging of pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  M Trede; B Rumstadt; K Wendl; J Gaa; K Tesdal; K J Lehmann; H J Meier-Willersen; P Pescatore; J Schmoll
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Pancreatic cancer. Laparoscopic staging and peritoneal cytology.

Authors:  C L Fernández-del Castillo; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.495

8.  Spiral CT and the pre-operative assessment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  S C Coley; N H Strickland; J D Walker; R C Williamson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  A R Kaufman; M V Sivak
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Nephrotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrast.

Authors:  M R Prince; C Arnoldus; J K Frisoli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Imaging for the diagnosis and staging of periampullary carcinomas.

Authors:  R M Walsh; M Connelly; M Baker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  An MRI-driven practice: a new perspective on MRI for the evaluation of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Diego Martin; N Volkan Adsay; David Kooby; Bobby Kalb; Juan M Sarmiento
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Preoperative evaluation of pancreaticobiliary tumor using MR multi-imaging techniques.

Authors:  Liang Zhong; Lei Li; Qiu-Ying Yao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

Authors:  Domenico Tamburrino; Deniece Riviere; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-15

5.  Staging laparoscopy for proximal pancreatic cancer in a magnetic resonance imaging-driven practice: what's it worth?

Authors:  Elliot Tapper; Bobby Kalb; Diego R Martin; David Kooby; N Volkan Adsay; Juan M Sarmiento
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Prospective evaluation of ultrasound and colour duplex imaging for the assessment of surgical resectability of pancreatic tumours.

Authors:  Robert Grützmann; Alfred Bunk; Stephan Kersting; Christian Pilarsky; Frank Dobrowolski; Eberhard Kuhlisch; Detlef Ockert; Hans Detlev Saeger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Preoperative staging and evaluation of resectability in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  R Andersson; C E Vagianos; R C N Williamson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction.

Authors:  Frances Tse; Jeffrey S Barkun; Joseph Romagnuolo; Gad Friedman; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Evaluation of pro-carboxypeptidase A and carboxypeptidase A as serologic markers for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  Peter Shamamian; Judith D Goldberg; Xiang Y Ye; Jonathan D Stewart; Peter J White; Charles Gilvarg
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  Multimodality imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio George Barreto; Mahesh Goel; Supreeta Arya
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.