Literature DB >> 12910422

Prospective evaluation of ultrasound and colour duplex imaging for the assessment of surgical resectability of pancreatic tumours.

Robert Grützmann1, Alfred Bunk, Stephan Kersting, Christian Pilarsky, Frank Dobrowolski, Eberhard Kuhlisch, Detlef Ockert, Hans Detlev Saeger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate colour duplex imaging (CDI) for the assessment of resectability of pancreatic tumours (PTs).
METHOD: From October 1998 to December 2001, 182 patients consecutively having surgery for a PT were enrolled in this prospective study. Extension of the tumour to large blood vessels and retroperitoneum, the detection of liver metastases, enlarged lymph nodes and peritoneal carcinomatosis were defined as criteria for assessment. The patients were grouped into three classes of resectability: US-TU 1 = resectable/potentially curable, US-TU 2 = questionably resectable/curable, and US-TU 3 = non-resectable/not curable. CDI was performed by five different examiners. Results were compared with intra-operative findings.
RESULTS: Using CDI, we classified 85 (46.7%) tumours as resectable, 64 (35.2%) as non-resectable, and 33 (18.1%) as questionably resectable. Overall, 46.2% ( n=84) were found to be resectable, and 53.8% ( n=98) to be non-resectable, intra-operatively. A correlation between CDI classification and intra-operative findings was found in 138 of 149 cases (92.6%) (sensitivity 88.4%, specificity 96.3%). With regard to the complete oncological status (local extension, metastases, lymph-node staging and peritoneal carcinomatosis), a sensitivity of 77.2% and specificity of 95.7% were found. Non-correlated findings were likely attributed to missing small liver metastases, peritoneal carcinomatosis without ascites, and on difficulties in the assessment of enlarged lymph nodes concerning tumour infiltration.
CONCLUSION: The use of CDI in evaluation of PTs may provide valuable pre-operative assessment of surgical resectability and may be performed in the clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12910422     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-003-0408-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  39 in total

1.  State-of-the-art ultrasonography is as accurate as helical computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography for detecting unresectable periampullary cancer.

Authors:  M M Morrin; J B Kruskal; V Raptopoulos; K Weisinger; R J Farrell; M L Steer; R A Kane
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of portal vein invasion in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  N Ueno; T Tomiyama; S Tano; S Wada; T Miyata
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Color Doppler imaging in the assessment of vascular involvement by pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  E Angeli; M Venturini; A Vanzulli; S Sironi; M Castrucci; M Salvioni; A Zerbi; V Di Carlo; A Del Maschio
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided real-time fine-needle aspiration: clinicopathologic features of 60 patients.

Authors:  J S Bentz; M L Kochman; D O Faigel; G G Ginsberg; D B Smith; P K Gupta
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.582

5.  [Ultrafast magnetic resonance tomography changes the standard in pancreas diagnosis].

Authors:  A Richter; J Gaa; M Niedergethmann; M Georgi; M Trede; S Post
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Preoperative assessment of blood vessel involvement in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  E Melzer; B Avidan; Z Heyman; A Coret; S Bar-Meir
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1996-11

7.  Color flow sonography in evaluating the resectability of periampullary and pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  P W Ralls; S M Wren; R Radin; S C Stain; J Yang; D Parekh
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  Pancreatic cancer: current concepts in imaging for diagnosis and staging.

Authors:  E Tamm; C Charnsangavej
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

9.  Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging improves the staging of pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  M Trede; B Rumstadt; K Wendl; J Gaa; K Tesdal; K J Lehmann; H J Meier-Willersen; P Pescatore; J Schmoll
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Modern imaging methods versus clinical assessment in the evaluation of hospital in-patients with suspected pancreatic disease.

Authors:  T Rösch; V Schusdziarra; P Born; W Bautz; M Baumgartner; K Ulm; R Lorenz; H D Allescher; P Gerhardt; J R Siewert; M Classen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: biology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Robert Grützmann; Marco Niedergethmann; Christian Pilarsky; Günter Klöppel; Hans D Saeger
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-12-08

Review 2.  [Cystic tumors of the pancreas].

Authors:  R Grützmann; H-D Saeger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a disappointing therapeutic approach?

Authors:  Carolin Zimmermann; Gunnar Folprecht; Daniel Zips; Christian Pilarsky; Hans Detlev Saeger; Robert Grutzmann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.