Literature DB >> 9443989

CT and MR evaluation of pancreatic cancer.

D A Bluemke1, E K Fishman.   

Abstract

CT scanning has a greater than 90% accuracy in staging patients with pancreatic cancer. New, powerful imaging techniques, such as spiral CT and gadolinium-enhanced MRI, can evaluate subtle changes in pancreatic contours and overall vascularity of the gland to further increase staging reliability. Spiral CT in particular provides excellent depiction of small vessels, high levels of pancreatic enhancement, and lack of respiratory misregistration. High resolution contrast-enhanced MR techniques may provide a new role for MR imaging in the evaluation of pancreatic cancer. This article discusses state-of-the-art CT and MR imaging techniques for pancreatic evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9443989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am        ISSN: 1055-3207            Impact factor:   3.495


  11 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  L M Fayad; D G Mitchell
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2001

2.  Pancreas-protocol imaging at a high-volume center leads to improved preoperative staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dustin M Walters; Damien J Lapar; Eduard E de Lange; Marc Sarti; Jayme B Stokes; Reid B Adams; Todd W Bauer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  A tumour score with multidetector spiral CT for venous infiltration in pancreatic cancer: influence on borderline resectable.

Authors:  Tiziana Marinelli; Antonella Filippone; Francesca Tavano; Andrea Fontana; Fabio Pellegrini; Jörg Köninger; Götz M Richter; Lorenzo Bonomo; Markus W Büchler; Pierluigi di Sebastiano; Francesco F di Mola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Improving outcomes in pancreatic cancer: key points in perioperative management.

Authors:  José M Alamo; Luis M Marín; Gonzalo Suarez; Carmen Bernal; Juan Serrano; Lydia Barrera; Miguel A Gómez; Jordi Muntané; Francisco J Padillo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Screening for pancreatic cancer: why, how, and who?

Authors:  Katherine E Poruk; Matthew A Firpo; Douglas G Adler; Sean J Mulvihill
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Is there still a role for laparoscopy combined with laparoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of pancreatic cancer?

Authors:  Matteo Barabino; Roberto Santambrogio; Andrea Pisani Ceretti; Rocco Scalzone; Marco Montorsi; Enrico Opocher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Is there a role for staging laparoscopy in patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Margo Shoup; Corinne Winston; Murray F Brennan; Diane Bassman; Kevin C Conlon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately predicts resectability of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  S N Hochwald; N M Rofsky; M Dobryansky; P Shamamian; S G Marcus
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Evaluation of pro-carboxypeptidase A and carboxypeptidase A as serologic markers for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  Peter Shamamian; Judith D Goldberg; Xiang Y Ye; Jonathan D Stewart; Peter J White; Charles Gilvarg
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Mass-forming pancreatitis with positive fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose positron emission tomography and positive diffusion-weighted imaging-magnetic resonance imaging: Report of a case.

Authors:  Masaaki Nishi; Toru Ikegami; Satoru Imura; Yuji Morine; Hirofumi Kanemura; Hiroki Mori; Yusuke Arakawa; Jun Hanaoka; Koji Sugimoto; Mitsuo Shimada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.