Literature DB >> 10479259

Psychologic response of the edentulous patient after primary surgery for oral cancer: A cross-sectional study.

S N Rogers1, D McNally, M Mahmoud, M F Chan, G M Humphris.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Edentulous patients can have difficulty in tolerating dentures and this may lead to psychologic disturbance. The problem is potentially more severe for edentulous patients after primary surgery for oral cancer, where treatment can include composite resection and reconstruction, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy.
PURPOSE: This study investigated the psychologic response and oral satisfaction of edentulous patients treated by surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma, and to make a comparison to edentulous noncancer counterparts. METHODS AND MATERIAL: The cross-sectional study included patients who were alive and disease-free 2 to 3 years after primary surgery. Seventy patients underwent surgery at the Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool, in 1993 and 1994. Twenty-eight patients were disease-free; 26 completed questionnaires that included a general health questionnaire (GHQ), a body satisfaction scale, a self-esteem scale, an oral symptom checklist, and a denture satisfaction questionnaire. Comparison was made with 98 noncancer edentulous patients from the same unit.
RESULTS: There were similarities in psychologic and oral satisfaction scores between the noncancer and cancer edentulous patients. Cancer patients reported lower self-esteem (P <.02). Cancer patients who were not rehabilitated with either conventional or implant-retained prostheses had significant psychologic morbidity as measured by the GHQ, self-esteem, and body satisfaction scales. Cancer patients with implant-retained overdentures reported greater satisfaction with their dentures compared with their counterparts who wore conventional dentures (P <.05).
CONCLUSION: Edentulous cancer patients who do not achieve oral rehabilitation after surgery for oral cancer exhibited significant psychologic morbidity. Patients with implant-retained overdentures exhibited a tendency to adopt the same psychologic response with improved denture satisfaction as edentulous patients with conventional dentures, despite the former having more extensive disease that would otherwise make the provision of dentures much more difficult if implants were not used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10479259     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70087-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  9 in total

1.  Treatment referral before and after the introduction of the Liverpool Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) into routine head and neck oncology outpatient clinics.

Authors:  Naseem Ghazali; Anastasios Kanatas; Daniel J R Langley; Barry Scott; Derek Lowe; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Restorative aspects of oral cancer reconstruction.

Authors:  C W Barclay; E C Foster; C L Taylor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Characteristics and referral of head and neck cancer patients who report chewing and dental issues on the Patient Concerns Inventory.

Authors:  R Mahmood; C Butterworth; D Lowe; S N Rogers
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  The use of dental implants, cast bars and sleeve overdentures in oral cancer patients.

Authors:  R Ali; A Al-Khayatt; C Barclay
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Quality of life in patients treated for cancer of the oral cavity requiring reconstruction: a prospective study.

Authors:  A Bolzoni Villaret; J Cappiello; C Piazza; B Pedruzzi; P Nicolai
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Enhanced patient reported outcome measurement suitable for head and neck cancer follow-up clinics.

Authors:  Naseem Ghazali; Derek Lowe; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2012-06-13

7.  Oral cancer malnutrition impacts weight and quality of life.

Authors:  Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Jörg Handschel; Henrik Holtmann; Gertrud Krüskemper
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Turkish Validation and Reliability of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 Quality of Life Scale for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Funda Akduran; Zehra Durna
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics?

Authors:  Sarah Allen; Derek Lowe; Rebecca V Harris; Steve Brown; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.503

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.