Literature DB >> 29674733

The use of dental implants, cast bars and sleeve overdentures in oral cancer patients.

R Ali1, A Al-Khayatt2, C Barclay3.   

Abstract

Surgical resection of an oral tumour (and the associated free flap reconstruction) can significantly alter the oral anatomy. The lack of sulcus depth, alveolar ridge, presence of a mobile flap and limited tongue movement can make it impossible for patients to control a removable prosthesis. To help this cohort of patients, dental implants can be invaluable. The Oral Rehabilitation Team at Central Manchester University Dental Hospital have used dental implants to rehabilitate oral cancer patients for over thirty years. After their resective surgery, a number of patients were dentally rehabilitated with a laboratory-made, precious metal-alloy bar supported by at least four dental implants. A metal-alloy under-sleeve retained overdenture was then provided to fit over the milled bar. The majority of the 50 patients in this case series had tumours in the anterior floor of the mouth. It was noted that 76% of the patients received a rim resection and were reconstructed with a fasciocutaneous, soft tissue free flap. Six percent of patients received a segmental resection and were reconstructed with either a fibular or deep circumflex iliac artery free flap. The dental implants and sleeve overdentures had a survival rate of 100%. None of the dentures lost retention, implying that the frictional grip between the overcasting and the milled bar was sufficient to appease the retention demands of this cohort. However, 10% of patients encountered complications. This would suggest a success (or complication free) rate of 90% for this cohort of 50 oncology patients. This would still imply that milled bars/sleeve overdentures carry a relatively low maintenance burden and may be a useful treatment option for oral cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29674733     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  18 in total

1.  The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Gerald Krennmair; Martin Krainhöfner; Eva Piehslinger
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  360 degrees peri-implant, keratinised, soft-tissue grafting with stereolithographic-aided dressing plate.

Authors:  A Kwasnicki; C Butterworth
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Long-term results of endosteal implants following radical oral cancer surgery with and without adjuvant radiation therapy.

Authors:  Sabine S Linsen; Markus Martini; Helmut Stark
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study.

Authors:  Gerald Krennmair; Daniel Sütö; Rudolf Seemann; Eva Piehslinger
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Attitudes of general dental practitioners to the maintenance of Locator retained implant overdentures.

Authors:  J W Vere; S Eliyas; P F Wragg
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts.

Authors:  Michael Weinländer; Eva Piehslinger; Gerald Krennmair
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Single unit attachments improve peri-implant soft tissue conditions in mandibular overdentures supported by four implants.

Authors:  Luca Cordaro; Vincenzo Mirisola di Torresanto; Nikola Petricevic; Primitivo Roig Jornet; Ferruccio Torsello
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Milled bar-supported implant overdenture after mandibular resection: a case report.

Authors:  Renata Vecchiatini; Nicola Mobilio; Demis Barbin; Santo Catapano; Giorgio Calura
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients--the York Consensus Statement.

Authors:  J Mark Thomason; Jocelyne Feine; Catherine Exley; Paula Moynihan; Frauke Müller; Ignace Naert; Janice S Ellis; Craig Barclay; Chris Butterworth; Brendan Scott; Christopher Lynch; Dominic Stewardson; Philip Smith; Richard Welfare; Paul Hyde; Robert McAndrew; Michael Fenlon; Stewart Barclay; Dean Barker
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  Quality of life related to oral function in edentulous head and neck cancer patients posttreatment.

Authors:  Pieter J Schoen; Harry Reintsema; Jelte Bouma; Jan L N Roodenburg; Arjan Vissink; Gerry M Raghoebar
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

View more
  1 in total

1.  Restorative aspects of oral cancer reconstruction.

Authors:  C W Barclay; E C Foster; C L Taylor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 1.626

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.