Literature DB >> 28836038

The effects of stimulus parameters on auditory evoked potentials of Carassius auratus.

Jessica R Garabon1, Dennis M Higgs2.   

Abstract

Whole-brain responses to sound are easily measured through auditory evoked potentials (AEP), but it is unclear how differences in experimental parameters affect these responses. The effect of varying parameters is especially unclear in fish studies, the majority of which use simple sound types and then extrapolate to natural conditions. The current study investigated AEPs in goldfish (Carassius auratus) using sounds of different durations (5, 10, and 20 ms) and frequencies (200, 500, 600 and 700 Hz) to test stimulus effects on latency and thresholds. We quantified differences in latency and threshold in comparison to a 10-ms test tone, a duration often used in AEP fish studies. Both response latency and threshold were significantly affected by stimulus duration, with latency patterning suggesting that AEP fires coincident with a decrease in stimulus strength. Response latency was also significantly affected by presentation frequency. These results show that stimulus type has important effects on AEP measures of hearing and call for clearer standards across different measures of AEP. Duration effects also suggest that AEP measures represent summed responses of duration-detecting neural circuit, but more effort is needed to understand the neural drivers of this commonly used technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory evoked potential; Fish hearing; Response latency; Stimulus duration; Threshold

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836038     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-017-1207-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  31 in total

1.  Effects of a red-tide toxin on fish hearing.

Authors:  Z Lu; S M Tomchik
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Auditory temporal computation: interval selectivity based on post-inhibitory rebound.

Authors:  Edward W Large; John D Crawford
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Fish hearing: new perspectives from two 'senior' bioacousticians.

Authors:  Richard R Fay; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Neuroethology deserves more study of evoked responses.

Authors:  T H Bullock
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Duration tuning across vertebrates.

Authors:  Brandon Aubie; Riziq Sayegh; Paul A Faure
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Ultrasound detection by clupeiform fishes.

Authors:  D A Mann; D M Higgs; W N Tavolga; M J Souza; A N Popper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pressure and particle motion detection thresholds in fish: a re-examination of salient auditory cues in teleosts.

Authors:  Craig A Radford; John C Montgomery; Paul Caiger; Dennis M Higgs
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  The influence of ambient temperature and thermal acclimation on hearing in a eurythermal and a stenothermal otophysan fish.

Authors:  Lidia Eva Wysocki; Karen Montey; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Stress and Auditory Responses of the Otophysan Fish, Cyprinella venusta, to Road Traffic Noise.

Authors:  Jenna A Crovo; Mary T Mendonça; Daniel E Holt; Carol E Johnston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish.

Authors:  Friedrich Ladich; Richard R Fay
Journal:  Rev Fish Biol Fish       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.