Literature DB >> 10472216

Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients.

G Rödig1, C Prasser, C Keyl, A Liebold, J Hobbhahn.   

Abstract

We have analysed the clinical agreement between two methods of continuous cardiac output measurement pulse contour analysis (PCCO) and a continuous thermodilution technique (CCO), were both compared with the intermittent bolus thermodilution technique (BCO). Measurements were performed in 26 cardiac surgical patients (groups 1 and 2, 13 patients each, with an ejection fraction > 45% and < 45%, respectively) at 12 selected times. During operation, mean differences (bias) between PCCO-BCO and CCO-BCO did not differ in either group. However, phenylephrine-induced increases in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) by approximately 60% resulted in significant differences. Significantly higher absolute bias values of PCCO-BCO compared with CCO-BCO were also found early after operation in the ICU. Thus PCCO and CCO provided comparable measurements during coronary bypass surgery. After marked changes in SVR, further calibration of the PCCO device is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10472216     DOI: 10.1093/bja/82.4.525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  33 in total

1.  Non-contact left ventricular endocardial mapping in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  P D Lambiase; A Rinaldi; J Hauck; M Mobb; D Elliott; S Mohammad; J S Gill; C A Bucknall
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Comparison between cardiac output measured by the pulmonary arterial thermodilution technique and that measured by the femoral arterial thermodilution technique in a pediatric animal model.

Authors:  M Rupérez; J López-Herce; C García; C Sánchez; E García; D Vigil
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 3.  [Measurement of cardiac output].

Authors:  D A Reuter; A E Goetz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  A new non-invasive continuous cardiac output trend solely utilizing routine cardiovascular monitors.

Authors:  Hironori Ishihara; Hirobumi Okawa; Ken Tanabe; Toshihito Tsubo; Yoshihiro Sugo; Takeshi Akiyama; Sunao Takeda
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Methods of monitoring shock.

Authors:  Ednan K Bajwa; Atul Malhotra; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.119

6.  Correlation between cardiac output measured by the femoral arterial thermodilution technique pulmonary arterial and that measured by contour pulse analysis in a paediatric animal model.

Authors:  Jesús López-Herce; Marta Rupérez; César Sánchez; Cristina García; Elena García
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Estimation of cardiac output in a pharmacological trial using a simple method based on arterial blood pressure signal waveform: a comparison with pulmonary thermodilution and echocardiographic methods.

Authors:  Jani Penttilä; Amir Snapir; Erkki Kentala; Juha Koskenvuo; Jussi Posti; Mika Scheinin; Harry Scheinin; Tom Kuusela
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Reliability of continuous pulse contour cardiac output measurement during hemodynamic instability.

Authors:  Anders Johansson; Michelle Chew
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Assessment of drift of pulse contour cardiac output over varying recalibration intervals.

Authors:  Martin Boyle; Margherita Murgo; Maureen O'Brien
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Subject-specific model estimation of cardiac output and blood volume during hemorrhage.

Authors:  Maxwell Lewis Neal; James B Bassingthwaighte
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng       Date:  2007-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.