Literature DB >> 10472098

Urgent surgical stabilization of spinal fractures in polytrauma patients.

R F McLain1, D R Benson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, longitudinal study of multiply injured patients treated with segmental instrumentation for spinal fractures with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether urgent stabilization of spinal fractures in severely injured patients increases the risk of surgery compared with early treatment and historical results. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Opinion in clinical studies is divided about whether operative treatment offers an advantage over nonoperative treatment in isolated spine fractures. Concomitant trauma is rarely discussed relative to decision making or surgical timing. Urgent stabilization of long-bone fractures improves survival and outcome in polytrauma patients. To date, urgent treatment of spine fractures in polytrauma patients has not been considered in the literature.
METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive patients treated with segmental instrumentation for spinal trauma were observed prospectively to assess perioperative and longterm outcome. Twenty-seven patients with severe polytrauma (injury severity score, > 26) were separately analyzed. Perioperative and postoperative results were analyzed relative to timing of surgery, injury severity score, and surgical approach. Urgent treatment was defined as that provided within 24 hours of the spinal injury, and early treatment was defined as that provided between 24 and 72 hours after injury.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (93%) sustained two or more major injuries in addition to the spine fracture, and 17 of 27 (63%) had neurologic injury. The mean injury severity score approached or exceeded the LD50 (50% expected mortality) in each group--36.0 for the early-treatment group and 42.0 for the urgent group--but only one patient in each group died. There were no deep venous thromboses, pulmonary emboli, neurologic injuries, decubiti, deep wound infections, or episodes of sepsis in either group. Blood loss for anterior procedures was significantly higher in the urgent group, but estimated blood loss for posterior procedures was similar for both groups. At 49 months' mean follow-up, no revisions were necessitated by the urgent spinal treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Urgent spinal stabilization is safe and appropriate in polytrauma patients when progressive neurologic deficit, thoracoabdominal trauma, or fracture instability increase the risks of delayed treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10472098     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199908150-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord injury: a systematic review of current treatment options.

Authors:  David W Cadotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Management of spine injuries in polytraumatized patients].

Authors:  C E Heyde; W Ertel; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Does timing of thoracic spine stabilization influence perioperative lung function after trauma?].

Authors:  C Schinkel; R Greiner-Perth; G Schwienhorst-Pawlowsky; T M Frangen; G Muhr; H Böhm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Timing of decompressive surgery of spinal cord after traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based examination of pre-clinical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Vanessa Noonan; David W Cadotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Thoracolumbar fractures surgically treated by "in situ contouring".

Authors:  Jean-Paul Steib; Mourad Aoui; Anca Mitulescu; Ioan Bogorin; Xavier Chiffolot; Jean-Michel Cognet; Patrick Simon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Delay in operative stabilization of spine fractures in multitrauma patients without neurologic injuries: effects on outcomes.

Authors:  Hossein Pakzad; Darren M Roffey; Heather Knight; Simon Dagenais; Jean-Denis Yelle; Eugene K Wai
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  Emerging approaches to the surgical management of acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  [Respiratory failure in thoracic spine injuries. Does the timing of dorsal stabilization have any effect on the clinical course in multiply injured patients?].

Authors:  Thomas M Frangen; S Ruppert; G Muhr; C Schinkel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 9.  [Decision making and and priorities for surgical treatment during and after shock trauma room treatment].

Authors:  H C Pape; F Hildebrand; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 10.  A methodological systematic review of early versus late stabilization of thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Authors:  Dan Xing; Yang Chen; Jian-Xiong Ma; Dong-Hui Song; Jie Wang; Yang Yang; Rui Feng; Jun Lu; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.