Literature DB >> 20001726

Timing of decompressive surgery of spinal cord after traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based examination of pre-clinical and clinical studies.

Julio C Furlan1, Vanessa Noonan, David W Cadotte, Michael G Fehlings.   

Abstract

While the recommendations for spine surgery in specific cases of acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) are well recognized, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the role of the timing of surgical decompression of the spinal cord in the management of patients with SCI. Given this, we sought to critically review the literature regarding the pre-clinical and clinical evidence on the potential impact of timing of surgical decompression of the spinal cord on outcomes after traumatic SCI. The primary literature search was performed using MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. A secondary search strategy incorporated articles referenced in prior meta-analyses and systematic and nonsystematic review articles. Two reviewers independently assessed every study with regard to eligibility, level of evidence, and study quality. Of 198 abstracts of pre-clinical studies, 19 experimental studies using animal SCI models fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Despite some discrepancies in the results of those pre-clinical studies, there is evidence for a biological rationale to support early decompression of the spinal cord. Of 153 abstracts of clinical studies, 22 fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. While the vast majority of the clinical studies were level-4 evidence, there were two studies of level-2b evidence. The quality assessment scores varied from 7 to 25 with a mean value of 12.41. While 2 of 22 clinical studies assessed feasibility and safety, 20 clinical studies examined efficacy of early surgical intervention to stabilize and align the spine and to decompress the spinal cord; the most common definitions of early operation used 24 and 72 h after SCI as timelines. A number of studies indicated that patients who undergo early surgical decompression can have similar outcomes to patients who received a delayed decompressive operation. However, there is evidence to suggest that early surgical intervention is safe and feasible and that it can improve clinical and neurological outcomes and reduce health care costs. Based on the current clinical evidence using a Delphi process, an expert panel recommended that early surgical intervention should be considered in all patients from 8 to 24 h following acute traumatic SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20001726      PMCID: PMC3143409          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2009.1147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  48 in total

1.  Experimental acute balloon compression of the spinal cord. Factors affecting disappearance and return of the spinal evoked response.

Authors:  A I Kobrine; D E Evans; H V Rizzoli
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Sustained spinal cord compression: part I: time-dependent effect on long-term pathophysiology.

Authors:  Gregory D Carlson; Carey D Gorden; Heather S Oliff; Jay J Pillai; Joseph C LaManna
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Reversible spinal cord trauma: a model for electrical monitoring of spinal cord function.

Authors:  T J Croft; J S Brodkey; F E Nulsen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  The influence of spinal canal narrowing and timing of decompression on neurologic recovery after spinal cord contusion in a rat model.

Authors:  J R Dimar; S D Glassman; G H Raque; Y P Zhang; C B Shields
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Effect of delayed local cooling on experimental spinal cord injury.

Authors:  P Thienprasit; H Bantli; J R Bloedel; S N Chou
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Traumatic central cord syndrome: results of surgical management.

Authors:  James Guest; Mohammed A Eleraky; Paul J Apostolides; Curtis A Dickman; Volker K H Sonntag
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  The value of decompression for acute experimental spinal cord compression injury.

Authors:  E J Dolan; C H Tator; L Endrenyi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Early stabilization and decompression for incomplete paraplegia due to a thoracic-level spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W F Krengel; P A Anderson; M B Henley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Effect of duration of acute spinal cord compression in a new acute cord injury model in the rat.

Authors:  A S Rivlin; C H Tator
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1978-07

10.  Spinal cord restitution following compression injuries in rats.

Authors:  B Nyström; J E Berglund
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.209

View more
  87 in total

Review 1.  Cervicothoracic spinal cord compression caused by IgG4-related sclerosing pachymeningitis: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Rui Gu; Peng-Yuan Hao; Jia-Bei Liu; Zhe-Hui Wang; Qing-San Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Optimization of the mean arterial pressure and timing of surgical decompression in traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective study.

Authors:  A Dakson; D Brandman; G Thibault-Halman; S D Christie
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  The incomplete picture of incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Robert E Ayer; Farbod Asgarzadie
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.829

4.  Management and prognosis of acute traumatic cervical central cord syndrome: systematic review and Spinal Cord Society-Spine Trauma Study Group position statement.

Authors:  P K Karthik Yelamarthy; H S Chhabra; Alex Vaccaro; Gayatri Vishwakarma; Patrick Kluger; Ankur Nanda; Rainer Abel; Wee Fu Tan; Brian Gardner; P Sarat Chandra; Sandip Chatterjee; Serdar Kahraman; Sait Naderi; Saumyajit Basu; Francois Theron
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Targeting microvasculature for neuroprotection after SCI.

Authors:  Janelle M Fassbender; Scott R Whittemore; Theo Hagg
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Race and socioeconomic disparity in treatment and outcome of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury with fracture: Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, 1998-2009.

Authors:  Alexander B Dru; Brett Reichwage; Dan Neal; Sasha Vaziri; Dennis Timothy Lockney; W Christopher Fox; Brian L Hoh; Daniel J Hoh
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: application of the AOSpine subaxial cervical spinal injury classification system to guide surgical timing.

Authors:  Jin-Peng Du; Yong Fan; Jia-Nan Zhang; Ji-Jun Liu; Yi-Bin Meng; Ding-Jun Hao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Emerging therapies for acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jefferson R Wilson; Nicole Forgione; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  A critical assessment of the quality of radiation therapy in Israel: time to initiation of treatment of spinal cord compression as an index of efficiency.

Authors:  Erez Beiser; Viacheslav Soyfer; Ilyia Novikov; Ido Wolf; Gil Fire; Benjamin W Corn
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Higher Mean Arterial Pressure Values Correlate with Neurologic Improvement in Patients with Initially Complete Spinal Cord Injuries.

Authors:  Joshua Stephen Catapano; Gregory William John Hawryluk; William Whetstone; Rajiv Saigal; Adam Ferguson; Jason Talbott; Jacqueline Bresnahan; Sanjay Dhall; Jonathan Pan; Michael Beattie; Geoffrey Manley
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.