Literature DB >> 10468293

Leucocyte nadir as a marker for chemotherapy efficacy in node-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant CMF.

P Poikonen1, T Saarto, J Lundin, H Joensuu, C Blomqvist.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between the leucocyte nadir and prognosis in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF). Three hundred and sixty-eight patients with node-positive breast cancer without distant metastases were treated with six cycles of adjuvant CMF. Some patients (n = 60) also received tamoxifen. All patients underwent surgery and received radiotherapy to the axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes and the chest wall. The effect of leucopenia caused by CMF on distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. A low leucocyte nadir during the chemotherapy was associated with a long DDFS in univariate analysis when tested as a continuous variable (the relative risk (RR) 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.06, P = 0.02). Similarly, when the leucocyte nadir count was divided into tertiles, the patients who had the highest nadir values during the six-cycle treatment had worst outcome (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.07-2.5, P = 0.02). However, in a multivariate analysis only the number of affected lymph nodes, tumour size, progesterone receptor status, surgical procedure, age and adjuvant tamoxifen therapy retained prognostic significance, whereas the leucocyte nadir count did not. A low leucocyte nadir during the adjuvant CMF chemotherapy is associated with favourable DDFS and it may be a useful biological marker for chemotherapy efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10468293      PMCID: PMC2363113          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  18 in total

1.  Dose-response effect of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  M Colleoni; K Price; M Castiglione-Gertsch; A Goldhirsch; A Coates; J Lindtner; J Collins; R D Gelber; B Thürlimann; C M Rudenstam
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Prospective evaluation of rotating chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial.

Authors:  D Tormey; R Gelman; G Falkson
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  The methodologic dilemma in retrospectively correlating the amount of chemotherapy received in adjuvant therapy protocols with disease-free survival.

Authors:  C Redmond; B Fisher; H S Wieand
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1983-06

4.  A preliminary assessment of factors associated with recurrent disease in a surgical adjuvant clinical trial for patients with breast cancer with special emphasis on the aggressiveness of therapy.

Authors:  D L Ahmann; J R O'Fallon; P W Scanlon; W S Payne; H F Bisel; J H Edmonson; S Frytak; R G Hahn; J N Ingle; J Rubin; E T Creagan
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  A controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with melphalan versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil for breast cancer.

Authors:  A Howell; R D Rubens; H Bush; W D George; J M Howat; D Crowther; R A Sellwood; J L Hayward; R K Knight; R D Bulbrook
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1984

6.  Dose-response effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Combination chemotherapy (CMFVP) versus L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) for operable breast cancer with positive axillary nodes: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  H Glucksberg; S E Rivkin; S Rasmussen; B Tranum; N Gad-el-Mawla; J Costanzi; B Hoogstraten; J Athens; T Maloney; J McCracken; C Vaughn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Combination chemotherapy for breast cancer metastatic to bone marrow.

Authors:  R Rodriguez-Kraul; G N Hortobagyi; A U Buzdar; G R Blumenschein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Adjuvant systemic therapy in high-risk breast cancer: the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group's trials of cyclophosphamide or CMF in premenopausal and tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients.

Authors:  H T Mouridsen; C Rose; H Brincker; S M Thorpe; F Rank; K Fischerman; K W Andersen
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1984

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Prognostic significance of neutropenia during adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy in early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yun Hwan Kim; Hyun Hoon Chung; Jae Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Optimization of clinical dosing schedule to manage neutropenia: learnings from semi-mechanistic modeling simulation approach.

Authors:  Yue Guo; Nahor Haddish-Berhane; Hong Xie; Daniele Ouellet
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ifosfamide and its metabolites.

Authors:  T Kerbusch; J de Kraker; H J Keizer; J W van Putten; H J Groen; R L Jansen; J H Schellens; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  The impact of actual body weight-based chemotherapy dosing and body size on adverse events and outcome in older patients with breast cancer: Results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial 49907 (Alliance A151436).

Authors:  Vicki A Morrison; Linda McCall; Hyman B Muss; Aminah Jatoi; Harvey J Cohen; Constance T Cirrincione; Jennifer A Ligibel; Jacqueline M Lafky; Arti Hurria
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Evaluation of chemotherapy-induced severe myelosuppression incidence in obese patients with capped dosing.

Authors:  Monique D Lopes-Serrao; Sarah M Gressett Ussery; Ronald G Hall; Sachin R Shah
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Quality of adjuvant CMF chemotherapy for node-positive primary breast cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Michael Schaapveld; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Winette T A van der Graaf; Renée Otter; Pax H B Willemse
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy dosing in obese patients: dissemination of information from clinical trials to clinical practice.

Authors:  Christopher G Greenman; Christina H Jagielski; Jennifer J Griggs
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Epidemiology of lung cancer prognosis: quantity and quality of life.

Authors:  Ping Yang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

10.  GALNT14 genotype, α-fetoprotein and therapeutic side effects predict post-chemotherapy survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Wey-Ran Lin; Chao-Wei Hsu; Yi-Cheng Chen; Ming-Ling Chang; Kung-Hao Liang; Ya-Hui Huang; Chau-Ting Yeh
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.