Literature DB >> 15258754

Quality of adjuvant CMF chemotherapy for node-positive primary breast cancer: a population-based study.

Michael Schaapveld1, Elisabeth G E de Vries, Winette T A van der Graaf, Renée Otter, Pax H B Willemse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adjuvant 'classical' oral cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) has long been the mainstay of adjuvant chemotherapy for premenopausal breast cancer patients. The Comprehensive Cancer Center North Netherlands (CCCN) breast cancer working group performed a retrospective audit of treatment guideline adherence and quality of CMF in hospitals in the CCCN area.
METHODS: The CMF treatment data of 251 consecutive axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer patients <50 years old, diagnosed between 1993 and 1996, were analyzed.
RESULTS: Ninety-four patients (42%) completed adjuvant CMF without dose adjustment or delay. Overall median relative dose intensity (RDI) was 92.6 (IQR 85.5-97.7). Sixty patients (24%) had an RDI <85, and 7% had an RDI <65. Myelotoxicity was the main reason for reductions and delays. Of 176 irradiated patients, 96% received radiotherapy simultaneously with CMF. Median CMF dose intensity nor median duration differed between patients who underwent mastectomy, mastectomy and radiotherapy, or breast-conserving therapy. Radiotherapy did not influence the median RDI (94 without versus 92 with radiotherapy). G-CSF, administered at least once to 76 patients, did not result in a higher median RDI. Median RDI was slightly higher when >3 patients/year (P=0.014) were treated by one specialist or >10 patients classified for adjuvant chemotherapy yearly in a hospital (P=0.037).
CONCLUSION: The adherence to CMF treatment guidelines was generally good. Simultaneous radiotherapy did not affect the median RDI of CMF. G-CSF had no impact on the median RDI but patient volume did influence the RDI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15258754     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-004-0583-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  28 in total

1.  Quality of adjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer in a non-trial setting. A comprehensive cancer centre study. The Breast Cancer Group of the Dutch Comprehensive Cancer Centre East (IKO).

Authors:  P B Ottevanger; C A Verhagen; L V Beex
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Dose-response effect of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  M Colleoni; K Price; M Castiglione-Gertsch; A Goldhirsch; A Coates; J Lindtner; J Collins; R D Gelber; B Thürlimann; C M Rudenstam
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Phase III trial comparing two dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Piccart; A Di Leo; M Beauduin; A Vindevoghel; J Michel; C Focan; A Tagnon; F Ries; P Gobert; C Finet; M T Closon-Dejardin; J P Dufrane; J Kerger; F Liebens; S Beauvois; S Bartholomeus; S Dolci; J P Lobelle; M Paesmans; J M Nogaret
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Concurrent CMF and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  A Dubey; A Recht; S E Come; R S Gelman; B Silver; J R Harris; L N Shulman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Management of early breast cancer in southeast Netherlands since 1984. A population-based study. Regional Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  A C Voogd; M W van Beek; M A Crommelin; H M Kluck; O J Repelaer van Driel; J W Coebergh
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  The effect of postoperative and primary radiation therapy on delivered dose of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J F Levine; C N Coleman; R S Cox; G R Ray; W M Rogoway; A Martinez; F E Stockdale
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; A Moliterni; M Zambetti; C Brambilla
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Influence of radiotherapy on the dose of adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.

Authors:  F Habibollahi; I S Fentiman; M A Chaudary; P J Winter; D Tong; J L Hayward; Z Doran; R D Rubens
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Fifth International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer, St Gallen, March 1995. International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; W C Wood; H J Senn; J H Glick; R D Gelber
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Breast cancer management: is volume related to quality? Clinical Advisory Panel.

Authors:  M Ma; J Bell; S Campbell; I Basnett; A Pollock; I Taylor
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  A Amadio; R Burkes; T Bailie; M McLean; B Coleman
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  The impact of adjuvant therapy on contralateral breast cancer risk and the prognostic significance of contralateral breast cancer: a population based study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Michael Schaapveld; Otto Visser; W J Louwman; Pax H B Willemse; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Winette T A van der Graaf; Renée Otter; Jan Willem W Coebergh; Flora E van Leeuwen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Does chemotherapy-induced neutropaenia result in a postponement of adjuvant or neoadjuvant regimens in breast cancer patients? Results of a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  M Debled; N Houédé; N Madranges; C Donamaria; A Floquet; M Durand; Louis Mauriac
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Healthcare providers' adherence to breast cancer guidelines in Europe: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ena Niño de Guzmán; Yang Song; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Luciana Neamtiu; Elena Parmelli; Javier Pérez-Bracchiglione; Montserrat Rabassa; David Rigau; Zuleika Saz Parkinson; Iván Solà; Adrián Vásquez-Mejía; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.872

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.