Literature DB >> 9893654

Dose-response effect of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

M Colleoni1, K Price, M Castiglione-Gertsch, A Goldhirsch, A Coates, J Lindtner, J Collins, R D Gelber, B Thürlimann, C M Rudenstam.   

Abstract

There is evidence in the literature of a relationship between dose and response to adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, although published results are conflicting. We therefore retrospectively analysed the role of dose response in patients included in four adjuvant trials of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG, formerly the Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group (trials I, II, III and V), all using 'classical' cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). A total of 1385 node-positive patients were treated with oral cyclophosphamide, and intravenous methotrexate plus 5-fluorouracil (CMF) for at least six 4 week courses. 1350 of these were included in 6 month landmark treatment outcome analyses. A total of 1029 patients were premenopausal, 321 were postmenopausal; 800 had one to three and 550 more than three involved axillary nodes at surgery. The median follow-up ranged from 12 years for trial V to 15 years for trials I-III. Patients were grouped according to three prospectively defined dose levels based on the percentage of the protocol prescribed dose that was actually administered (level I > or = 85%, level II 65-84%, level III < 65%). Patients who received dose level II had a higher disease-free (P = 0.07) and overall survival (P = 0.03) than those who received a higher (level I) or lower (level III) percentage. The 10 year overall survival was 60% for dose level II, 56% for dose level I, 51% for dose level III. The results were generally consistent within trial, menopausal status, and oestrogen receptor status groups. The results within nodal groups showed a large difference among the dose levels for the group with one to three positive nodes (P = 0.02), but no difference for the group with four or more positive nodes. Our results indicate that the dose-response effect remains a crucial factor in adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer. Reductions larger than 35% in the dose administered of oral CMF adversely influenced the outcome of breast cancer patients and should be avoided. The better outcome of the intermediate dose group indicates the need to investigate other aspects involved in the cytotoxicity of adjuvant CMF chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9893654     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00209-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  12 in total

1.  Does adjuvant chemotherapy dose modification have an impact on the outcome of patients diagnosed with advanced stage ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Alexander B Olawaiye; James J Java; Thomas C Krivak; Michael Friedlander; David G Mutch; Gretchen Glaser; Melissa Geller; David M O'Malley; Robert M Wenham; Roger B Lee; Diane C Bodurka; Thomas J Herzog; Michael A Bookman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Dose dense cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil is feasible at 14-day intervals: a pilot study of every-14-day dosing as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Pamela Drullinsky; Steven M Sugarman; Monica N Fornier; Gabriella D'Andrea; Teresa Gilewski; Diana Lake; Tiffany Traina; Carolyn Wasserheit-Lieblich; Nancy Sklarin; Deena Atieh-Graham; Nancy Mills; Tiffany Troso-Sandoval; Andrew D Seidman; Jeffrey Yuan; Hamangi Patel; Sujata Patil; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Quality of adjuvant CMF chemotherapy for node-positive primary breast cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Michael Schaapveld; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Winette T A van der Graaf; Renée Otter; Pax H B Willemse
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Characterization of endogenous G-CSF and the inverse correlation to chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer using population modeling.

Authors:  Angelica L Quartino; Mats O Karlsson; Henrik Lindman; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Impact of a reduced dose intensity of adjuvant anthracycline based chemotherapy in a population-based cohort of stage I-II breast cancers.

Authors:  A V Tinker; C Speers; J Barnett; I A Olivotto; S Chia
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2008-07-08

6.  Leucocyte nadir as a marker for chemotherapy efficacy in node-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant CMF.

Authors:  P Poikonen; T Saarto; J Lundin; H Joensuu; C Blomqvist
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Leucopenia and treatment efficacy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhen Su; Yan-Ping Mao; Pu-Yun OuYang; Jie Tang; Xiao-Wen Lan; Fang-Yun Xie
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The impact of delayed chemotherapy on its completion and survival outcomes in stage II colon cancer patients.

Authors:  Fang Xu; Alfred A Rimm; Pingfu Fu; Smitha S Krishnamurthi; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Does chemotherapy-induced neutropaenia result in a postponement of adjuvant or neoadjuvant regimens in breast cancer patients? Results of a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  M Debled; N Houédé; N Madranges; C Donamaria; A Floquet; M Durand; Louis Mauriac
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Prognostic nutritional index before adjuvant chemotherapy predicts chemotherapy compliance and survival among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Shimizu; Riki Okita; Shinsuke Saisho; Takuro Yukawa; Ai Maeda; Yuji Nojima; Masao Nakata
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.