Literature DB >> 15976315

Differences between left and right ventricular chamber geometry affect cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.

Blanca Rodríguez1, Li Li, James C Eason, Igor R Efimov, Natalia A Trayanova.   

Abstract

Although effects of shock strength and waveform on cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks have been extensively documented, the contribution of ventricular anatomy to shock-induced polarization and postshock propagation and thus, to shock outcome, has never been quantified; this is caused by lack of experimental methodology capable of mapping 3-D electrical activity. The goal of this study was to use optical imaging experiments and 3-D bidomain simulations to investigate the role of structural differences between left and right ventricles in vulnerability to electric shocks in rabbit hearts. The ventricles were paced apically, and uniform-field, truncated-exponential, monophasic shocks of reversed polarity were applied over a range of coupling intervals (CIs) in experiment and model. Experiments and simulations revealed that reversing the direction of externally-applied field (RV- or LV- shocks) alters the shape of the vulnerability area (VA), the 2-D grid encompassing episodes of arrhythmia induction. For RV- shocks, VA was nearly rectangular indicating little dependence of postshock arrhythmogenesis on CI. For LV- shocks, the probability of arrhythmia induction was higher for longer than for shorter CIs. The 3-D simulations demonstrated that these effects stem from the fact that reversal of field direction results in relocation of the main postshock excitable area from LV wall (RV- shocks) to septum (LV- shocks). Furthermore, the effect of septal (but not LV) excitable area in postshock propagation was found to strongly depend on preshock state. Knowledge regarding the location of the main postshock excitable area within the 3-D ventricular volume could be important for improving defibrillation efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15976315      PMCID: PMC2925187          DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000174429.00987.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  32 in total

1.  A simulation study evaluating the performance of high-density electrode arrays on myocardial tissue.

Authors:  J C Eason; R A Malkin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation.

Authors:  I R Efimov; F Aguel; Y Cheng; B Wollenzier; N Trayanova
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs.

Authors:  P S Chen; G K Feld; M M Mower; B B Peters
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  A generalized activating function for predicting virtual electrodes in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  E A Sobie; R C Susil; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks. Implications for defibrillation efficacy.

Authors:  S Behrens; C Li; P Kirchhof; F L Fabritz; M R Franz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  The mechanisms of the vulnerable window: the role of virtual electrodes and shock polarity.

Authors:  Y Yamanouchi; Y Cheng; P J Tchou; I R Efimov
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.273

7.  Myocardial vulnerability to T wave shocks: relation to shock strength, shock coupling interval, and dispersion of ventricular repolarization.

Authors:  C L Fabritz; P F Kirchhof; S Behrens; M Zabel; M R Franz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-03

8.  Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves.

Authors:  R A Malkin; S F Idriss; R G Walker; R E Ideker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Influence of shock strength and timing on induction of ventricular arrhythmias in dogs.

Authors:  N Shibata; P S Chen; E G Dixon; P D Wolf; N D Danieley; W M Smith; R E Ideker
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1988-10

10.  Comparison of upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation probability of success curves using a nonthoracotomy lead system.

Authors:  J J Souza; R A Malkin; R E Ideker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  65 in total

1.  Distribution of electromechanical delay in the heart: insights from a three-dimensional electromechanical model.

Authors:  V Gurev; J Constantino; J J Rice; N A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Reversible cardiac conduction block and defibrillation with high-frequency electric field.

Authors:  Harikrishna Tandri; Seth H Weinberg; Kelly C Chang; Renjun Zhu; Natalia A Trayanova; Leslie Tung; Ronald D Berger
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Validating defibrillation simulation in a human-shaped phantom.

Authors:  Jess D Tate; Thomas A Pilcher; Kedar K Aras; Brett M Burton; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Patient-specific generation of the Purkinje network driven by clinical measurements of a normal propagation.

Authors:  Christian Vergara; Simone Palamara; Domenico Catanzariti; Fabio Nobile; Elena Faggiano; Cesarino Pangrazzi; Maurizio Centonze; Massimiliano Maines; Alfio Quarteroni; Giuseppe Vergara
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Modeling defibrillation of the heart: approaches and insights.

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova; Jason Constantino; Takashi Ashihara; Gernot Plank
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011

6.  Vulnerable window for conduction block in a one-dimensional cable of cardiac cells, 1: single extrasystoles.

Authors:  Zhilin Qu; Alan Garfinkel; James N Weiss
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Cardiac defibrillation and the role of mechanoelectric feedback in postshock arrhythmogenesis.

Authors:  Viatcheslav Gurev; Mary M Maleckar; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Photon scattering effects in optical mapping of propagation and arrhythmogenesis in the heart.

Authors:  Martin J Bishop; David J Gavaghan; Natalia A Trayanova; Blanca Rodriguez
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.438

9.  Evaluating intramural virtual electrodes in the myocardial wedge preparation: simulations of experimental conditions.

Authors:  G Plank; A Prassl; E Hofer; N A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  The role of transmural ventricular heterogeneities in cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.

Authors:  Thushka Maharaj; Robert Blake; Natalia Trayanova; David Gavaghan; Blanca Rodriguez
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.