Literature DB >> 17491097

Hand bone densitometry: a more sensitive standard for the assessment of early bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Glenn Haugeberg1, Michael J Green, Philip G Conaghan, Mark Quinn, Richard Wakefield, Susanna M Proudman, Sheena Stewart, Elizabeth Hensor, Paul Emery.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of hand dual-energy x ray absorptiometry (DEXA) compared with radiography in the assessment of bone involvement in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have active disease.
METHODS: The study population (n = 79) had RA of <12 months' duration and were selected for poor prognostic features. Clinical data and bone mineral density (BMD) data were collected at baseline, 24 and 48 weeks. Hand radiographs were performed at baseline and 48 weeks. Bone damage analyses were performed for the group and individuals using the smallest detectable change (SDC) method.
RESULTS: At baseline, mean disease duration was 8.5 months, erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 34.3 mm/hour, C-reactive protein was 40.2 mg/l, Health Assessment Questionnaire score was 1.35 and 81% of patients were positive for rheumatoid factor. Mean (95% CI) hand BMD loss was 2.5% (-3.5 to -1.5) at 24 weeks and 2.6% (-3.8 to -1.5) at 48 weeks. Individual hand bone loss exceeding the SDC was seen in 46.8% at 24 weeks and in 58.2% at 48 weeks. In the subgroup of 58 patients who had undergone radiography, radiographic joint damage score evaluated by the Sharp-van der Heijde method increased from 4.8 to 10.6 (p = 0.001). Individual hand bone loss in this subgroup exceeding the SDC was seen in 50.0% at 24 weeks and in 56.9% at 48 weeks, whereas at 48 weeks only 22.4% had deteriorated in modified Sharp score.
CONCLUSION: The study results indicate that hand DEXA is a more sensitive tool than radiology (radiographic joint-damage scores), for measuring disease-related bone damage in early RA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17491097      PMCID: PMC2111631          DOI: 10.1136/ard.2006.067652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  33 in total

1.  Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques.

Authors:  C C Glüer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Robustness and generalizability of smallest detectable difference in radiological progression.

Authors:  M N Lassere; D van der Heijde; K Johnson; K Bruynesteyn; E Molenaar; A Boonen; A Verhoeven; P Emery; M Boers
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 3.  Cellular mechanisms and the role of cytokines in bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  E M Gravallese; S R Goldring
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2000-10

4.  Radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: does it reflect outcome? Does it reflect treatment?

Authors:  D van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Bone changes in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M J Green; A A Deodhar
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  Hand bone loss in early undifferentiated arthritis: evaluating bone mineral density loss before the development of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  G Haugeberg; M J Green; M A Quinn; H Marzo-Ortega; S Proudman; Z Karim; R J Wakefield; P G Conaghan; S Stewart; P Emery
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Protein expression and functional difference of membrane-bound and soluble receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand: modulation of the expression by osteotropic factors and cytokines.

Authors:  T Nakashima; Y Kobayashi; S Yamasaki; A Kawakami; K Eguchi; H Sasaki; H Sakai
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography.

Authors:  R J Wakefield; W W Gibbon; P G Conaghan; P O'Connor; D McGonagle; C Pease; M J Green; D J Veale; J D Isaacs; P Emery
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2000-12

Review 9.  Radiographic imaging: the 'gold standard' for assessment of disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D M van der Heijde
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  Treatment of poor-prognosis early rheumatoid arthritis. A randomized study of treatment with methotrexate, cyclosporin A, and intraarticular corticosteroids compared with sulfasalazine alone.

Authors:  S M Proudman; P G Conaghan; C Richardson; B Griffiths; M J Green; D McGonagle; R J Wakefield; R J Reece; S Miles; A Adebajo; A Gough; P Helliwell; M Martin; G Huston; C Pease; D J Veale; J Isaacs; D M van der Heijde; P Emery
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2000-08
View more
  13 in total

1.  Generalized bone loss as a predictor of three-year radiographic damage in African American patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; David T Redden; Gerald McGwin; Leigh F Callahan; Edwin A Smith; Graciela S Alarcón; Larry W Moreland; Désirée M van der Heijde; Elizabeth E Brown; Donna K Arnett; Ted R Mikuls; S Louis Bridges
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-08

Review 2.  Hand bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Gamze Kilic; Salih Ozgocmen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

3.  Correlation between hand bone mineral density and joint destruction in established rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Takeshi Mochizuki; Koichiro Yano; Katsunori Ikari; Ryo Hiroshima; Yu Sakuma; Shigeki Momohara
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-02

4.  Using hand bone mass measurements to assess progression of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Mari Hoff; Glenn Haugeberg
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 5.  Osteoporosis in inflammatory joint diseases.

Authors:  C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Is hand bone mineral density a marker for hand function in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis? The correlation among bone mineral density of the hand, radiological findings and hand function.

Authors:  Beril Dogu; Banu Kuran; Figen Yilmaz; Ahmet Usen; Hulya Sirzai
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Measurement of periarticular bone mineral density in the hands of patients with early inflammatory arthritis using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Eithne Murphy; Barry Bresnihan; Oliver FitzGerald
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 8.  [Bone densitometry in inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Characteristics of the measurement site and disease-specific factors].

Authors:  H Franck; J Braun; F Buttgereit; W Demary; G Hein; J Kekow; G Schett; P M Kern
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Associations with subregional BMD-measurements in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  H Franck; J Gottwalt
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Antibodies to cyclic citrullinated protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate predict hand bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of short duration: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Pernille Bøyesen; Mari Hoff; Sigrid Odegård; Glenn Haugeberg; Silje W Syversen; Per I Gaarder; Cecilie Okkenhaug; Tore K Kvien
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.