Literature DB >> 10453777

Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing and the laryngeal adductor reflex.

J E Aviv1, J H Martin, T Kim, R L Sacco, J E Thomson, B Diamond, L G Close.   

Abstract

Laryngopharyngeal sensory capacity has been determined by endoscopically administering air pulse stimuli to the mucosa innervated by the superior laryngeal nerve and asking the patient if he or she feels the stimulus. A potential shortcoming of this psychophysical testing (PT) procedure is that it is a subjective test, and patients with impaired cognition may not be able to perform the required task. In the search for an objective measure of laryngeal sensory function, we have observed that the laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) is evoked at stimulus intensities similar to those capable of eliciting the psychophysical, or perceptual, response. The purpose of this study is to determine if the threshold for eliciting the LAR is the same as that of the sensory threshold. A specially designed endoscope was used to present air pulse stimuli (range 0.0 to 10 mm Hg) to the laryngopharynx in 20 healthy subjects and in 80 patients with dysphagia, using both PT and the LAR. The patients had a variety of underlying diagnoses, with stroke and chronic neurologic disease predominating (n = 65). In the control group and in the group of patients with dysphagia, there was no statistically significant difference between the median laryngopharyngeal sensory thresholds whether we used PT or the LAR (p>.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The intraclass correlation for the total sample was .999 (U = .999, L = .998). Since psychophysical and sensorimotor reflex thresholds were not statistically significantly different and the intraclass correlation was close to a perfect correlation, we conclude that the LAR can be used as an objective and accurate clinical method of endoscopically assessing laryngopharyngeal sensory capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10453777     DOI: 10.1177/000348949910800802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  23 in total

Review 1.  The Kölliker-Fuse nucleus: a review of animal studies and the implications for cranial nerve function in humans.

Authors:  Nanna Browaldh; Tara G Bautista; Mathias Dutschmann; Robert G Berkowitz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Suppression of thyroarytenoid muscle responses during repeated air pressure stimulation of the laryngeal mucosa in awake humans.

Authors:  Pamela Reed Kearney; Christopher J Poletto; Eric A Mann; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Oropharyngeal stimulation with air-pulse trains increases swallowing frequency in healthy adults.

Authors:  Julie A Theurer; Frank Bihari; Amy M Barr; Ruth E Martin
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Laryngeal reflex responses are not modulated during human voice and respiratory tasks.

Authors:  Victor M Henriquez; Geralyn M Schulz; Steven Bielamowicz; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Liquiritin apioside attenuates laryngeal chemoreflex but not mechanoreflex in rat pups.

Authors:  Wan Wei; Xiuping Gao; Lei Zhao; Jianguo Zhuang; Yang Jiao; Fadi Xu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.464

6.  Reliability of a laryngo-pharyngeal esthesiometer and a method for measuring laryngo-pharyngeal mechano-sensitivity in a prospectively recruited cohort of patients.

Authors:  Luis F Giraldo-Cadavid; Javier Burguete; Felipe Rueda; Ana M Galvis; Natalia Castaneda; Luis M Agudelo-Otalora; William D Moscoso; Nelson Paez; Secundino Fernandez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Neurophysiology and Clinical Implications of the Laryngeal Adductor Reflex.

Authors:  Amanda S Domer; Maggie A Kuhn; Peter C Belafsky
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2013-09

8.  Accuracy of a Laryngopharyngeal Endoscopic Esthesiometer (LPEER) for Evaluating Laryngopharyngeal Mechanosensitivity: A Validation Study in a Prospectively Recruited Cohort of Patients.

Authors:  Luis F Giraldo-Cadavid; Javier Burguete; Felipe Rueda; Ana M Galvis; Natalia Castaneda; Mario Arbulu; Jorge I Balaguera; Nelson Paez; Secundino Fernandez
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Droplet applicator module for reproducible and controlled endoscopic laryngeal adductor reflex stimulation.

Authors:  J F Fast; K A Westermann; M-H Laves; M Jungheim; M Ptok; T Ortmaier; L A Kahrs
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.800

10.  Design of a new somatosensory stimulus delivery device for measuring laryngeal mechanosensory detection thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Michael J Hammer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.