Literature DB >> 15895780

Suppression of thyroarytenoid muscle responses during repeated air pressure stimulation of the laryngeal mucosa in awake humans.

Pamela Reed Kearney1, Christopher J Poletto, Eric A Mann, Christy L Ludlow.   

Abstract

Repeated stimulation of the laryngeal mucosa occurs during speech. Single stimuli, however, can elicit the laryngeal adductor response (LAR). Our hypothesis was that the LAR to repeated rapid air pressure stimuli is centrally suppressed in humans. Hooked-wire electrodes were inserted into the thyroarytenoid and cricothyroid muscles on both sides and into the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle on one side. Pairs of air puff stimuli were presented to the mucosa over the arytenoids at pressure levels three times threshold with interstimulus intervals from 250 to 5,000 ms. Bilateral thyroarytenoid responses occurred at around 150 ms to more than 70% of the initial stimuli. With repeated presentation at intervals of 2 seconds or less, the percent occurrence decreased to less than 40% and response amplitudes were reduced by 50%. Central suppression of adductor responses to repeated air puff stimuli may allow speakers to produce voice without eliciting reflexive spasms that could disrupt speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15895780      PMCID: PMC2329803          DOI: 10.1177/000348940511400403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  20 in total

1.  The audiometric evaluation of adult aphasics.

Authors:  C L Ludlow; L P Swisher
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-09

2.  Air pulse quantification of supraglottic and pharyngeal sensation: a new technique.

Authors:  J E Aviv; J H Martin; M S Keen; M Debell; A Blitzer
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Habituation and sensitization of components of the human eyeblink reflex.

Authors:  J N Sanes; J R Ison
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Mechanical and physiological properties of reflex laryngeal closure.

Authors:  Y Murakami; J A Kirchner
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Quantitative analysis of laryngeal mechanosensitivity in the cat and rabbit.

Authors:  P J Davis; B S Nail
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Characteristics of late responses to superior laryngeal nerve stimulation in humans.

Authors:  C L Ludlow; F Van Pelt; J Koda
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  The response of laryngeal afferent fibres to mechanical and chemical stimuli.

Authors:  H A Boushey; P S Richardson; J G Widdicombe; J C Wise
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Effect of cold air on laryngeal mechanoreceptors in the dog.

Authors:  G Sant'Ambrogio; F Brambilla-Sant'Ambrogio; O P Mathew
Journal:  Respir Physiol       Date:  1986-04

9.  Abnormalities in long latency responses to superior laryngeal nerve stimulation in adductor spasmodic dysphonia.

Authors:  C L Ludlow; G M Schulz; T Yamashita; F W Deleyiannis
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Assessing the clinical utility of the magnetic stimulator for measuring response latencies in the laryngeal muscles.

Authors:  H S Sims; T Yamashita; K Rhew; C L Ludlow
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.591

View more
  12 in total

1.  Laryngeal reflex responses are not modulated during human voice and respiratory tasks.

Authors:  Victor M Henriquez; Geralyn M Schulz; Steven Bielamowicz; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Comparison of labial and mechanical interruption for measurement of aerodynamic parameters.

Authors:  William J Chapin; Matthew R Hoffman; Adam L Rieves; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Droplet applicator module for reproducible and controlled endoscopic laryngeal adductor reflex stimulation.

Authors:  J F Fast; K A Westermann; M-H Laves; M Jungheim; M Ptok; T Ortmaier; L A Kahrs
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  Central nervous system control of the laryngeal muscles in humans.

Authors:  Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 1.931

Review 5.  Central voice production and pathophysiology of spasmodic dysphonia.

Authors:  Niv Mor; Kristina Simonyan; Andrew Blitzer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Reliable time to estimate subglottal pressure.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Christopher D Baggott; Jack Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Indirect estimation of laryngeal resistance via airflow redirection.

Authors:  Adam L Rieves; Matthew R Hoffman; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 8.  Research priorities in spasmodic dysphonia.

Authors:  Christy L Ludlow; Charles H Adler; Gerald S Berke; Steven A Bielamowicz; Andrew Blitzer; Susan B Bressman; Mark Hallett; H A Jinnah; Uwe Juergens; Sandra B Martin; Joel S Perlmutter; Christine Sapienza; Andrew Singleton; Caroline M Tanner; Gayle E Woodson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Phonation threshold pressure estimation using electroglottography in an airflow redirection system.

Authors:  Adam L Rieves; Michael F Regner; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Laryngeal Reflexes: Physiology, Technique, and Clinical Use.

Authors:  Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.177

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.