Literature DB >> 10452412

The association of energy intake bias with psychological scores of women.

D L Taren1, M Tobar, A Hill, W Howell, C Shisslak, I Bell, C Ritenbaugh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assess the association between reporting bias of dietary energy intake and the behavioral and psychological profiles in women.
DESIGN: At baseline a series of questionnaires were administered to 37 women, (the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, Weinberger Adjustment Inventory (WAI), the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI), the Restraint Scale and Sorensen-Stunkard's silhouettes). Subjects received training on how to record dietary records. Subjects recorded three days of dietary records to measure energy intake (EI) during a study to determine total energy expenditure (TEE) using doubly labeled water. Reporting accuracy (RA = EI/TEE x 100) was determined for each subject. Statistical analysis of the data used a mixed effects model accounting for within subject variability to determine if the psychological scores were associated with reporting accuracy. SETTING AND SUBJECT: Women were recruited with local advertisements in Tucson, Arizona. The women had a mean ( +/- 1 s.d.) age of 43.6 +/- 9.3 yrs, body mass index (BMI) of 28.7 +/- 8.5 kg/m2 and total body fat (%TBF) of 31.9 +/- 7.3%.
RESULTS: Age and %TBF were significantly and inversely associated with RA. Furthermore, Social Desirability was negatively associated with RA. Body dissatisfaction and associating a smaller body size than one's own as being more healthy were also associated with a lower RA.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that Social Desirability and self image of body shape are associated with RA. Modifications in subject training may reduce the effect of these factors on RA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10452412     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  19 in total

1.  Underreporting in obese inpatients undergoing a psycho-nutritional rehabilitative program.

Authors:  Hellas Cena; Clio Oggioni; Chiara Turpini; Fabiana Negri; Carla Roggi; Chiara Allegri
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 2.  Considering the value of dietary assessment data in informing nutrition-related health policy.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Thomas G Hurley; Susan E Steck; Donald R Miller; Fred K Tabung; Karen E Peterson; Lawrence H Kushi; Edward A Frongillo
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  What Makes Nutrition Research So Difficult to Conduct and Interpret?

Authors:  Mara Z Vitolins; Talsi L Case
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2020-05

4.  Shortening the retention interval of 24-hour dietary recalls increases fourth-grade children's accuracy for reporting energy and macronutrient intake at school meals.

Authors:  Suzanne Domel Baxter; Caroline H Guinn; Julie A Royer; James W Hardin; Albert F Smith
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2010-08

5.  Diet Quality Following Food Pantry Visit Differs by Ethnicity.

Authors:  Eliza Short; Lindsay N Kohler; Douglas Taren; Rhonda Gonzalez; Denise J Roe; Melanie Hingle
Journal:  J Hunger Environ Nutr       Date:  2020-12-16

6.  Comparison of self-reported, measured, metabolizable energy intake with total energy expenditure in overweight teens.

Authors:  Rajni Singh; Berdine R Martin; Yvonne Hickey; Dorothy Teegarden; Wayne W Campbell; Bruce A Craig; Dale A Schoeller; Deborah Anne Kerr; Connie M Weaver
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Fourth graders' reports of fruit and vegetable intake at school lunch: does treatment assignment affect accuracy?

Authors:  Kathleen Fleege Harrington; Connie L Kohler; Leslie A McClure; Frank A Franklin
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2009-01

8.  Children's Social Desirability and Dietary Reports.

Authors:  Suzanne Domel Baxter; Albert F Smith; Mark S Litaker; Michelle L Baglio; Caroline H Guinn; Nicole M Shaffer
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.045

9.  Factors relating to eating style, social desirability, body image and eating meals at home increase the precision of calibration equations correcting self-report measures of diet using recovery biomarkers: findings from the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Lesley F Tinker; Ying Huang; Marian L Neuhouser; Susan E McCann; Rebecca A Seguin; Mara Z Vitolins; J David Curb; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Effects of social approval bias on self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tracy M Miller; Madiha F Abdel-Maksoud; Lori A Crane; Al C Marcus; Tim E Byers
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.