Literature DB >> 23760849

Underreporting in obese inpatients undergoing a psycho-nutritional rehabilitative program.

Hellas Cena1, Clio Oggioni, Chiara Turpini, Fabiana Negri, Carla Roggi, Chiara Allegri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible correlation between underreporting and anthropometric, psychological and socio-anagraphic characteristics in obese inpatients.
DESIGN: Perspective longitudinal study.
SUBJECTS: Forty-two obese inpatients enrolled to a multidisciplinary 3-week weight loss program in a psycho-nutritional rehabilitative structure located in Salice Terme, Northern Italy. They underwent anthropometric, dietary, clinical, and psycho diagnostic evaluation.
RESULTS: Forty-two subjects were included in the study of which 29 (70 %) were females and 13 were males. Mean BMI and mean waist circumference were 42.7 ± 9.5 kg/m(2) and 125 ± 18 cm, respectively. The mean weight loss of 4.2 ± 2.2 kg in the whole sample was significantly greater in males compared to females. The waist circumference fell in equal measure in both of the sexes. Thirty patients were classified as underreporters according to Goldberg, two-thirds of which were females. In the course of the three recovery weeks, a third of the 30 subjects identified as underreporters at the beginning continued to underreport energy intake.
CONCLUSION: In our study, the prevalence of underreporting was equal to over 70 % of the original sample. There was no significant difference between the weight losses achieved by the underreporter and non-underreporter groups. All the underreporters initially became partly non-underreporters during treatment. Those who gave up the practice of underreporting were patients who had a more elevated BMI, who were more susceptible to binge eating behavior and who experienced a strong uneasiness both physically and psychologically. They also had a strongly impaired quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23760849     DOI: 10.1007/s40519-013-0018-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Weight Disord        ISSN: 1124-4909            Impact factor:   4.652


  48 in total

1.  Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations.

Authors:  A E Black
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-09

Review 2.  Validity of the assessment of dietary intake: problems of misreporting.

Authors:  Klaas R Westerterp; Annelies H C Goris
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 3.  How accurate is self-reported dietary energy intake?

Authors:  D A Schoeller
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents.

Authors:  M B Livingstone; A M Prentice; W A Coward; J J Strain; A E Black; P S Davies; C M Stewart; P G McKenna; R G Whitehead
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Energy and protein requirements. Proceedings of an IDECG workshop. London, United Kingdom, 31 October-4 November 1994.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  The Body Uneasiness Test (BUT): development and validation of a new body image assessment scale.

Authors:  M Cuzzolaro; G Vetrone; G Marano; P E Garfinkel
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.652

7.  Quality of life and overweight: the obesity related well-being (Orwell 97) questionnaire.

Authors:  E Mannucci; V Ricca; E Barciulli; M Di Bernardo; R Travaglini; P L Cabras; C M Rotella
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Who underreports dietary intake in a dietary recall? Evidence from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  R C Klesges; L H Eck; J W Ray
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1995-06

Review 9.  Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 2. Evaluating the results of published surveys.

Authors:  A E Black; G R Goldberg; S A Jebb; M B Livingstone; T J Cole; A M Prentice
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  The accuracy of the Goldberg method for classifying misreporters of energy intake on a food frequency questionnaire and 24-h recalls: comparison with doubly labeled water.

Authors:  J A Tooze; S M Krebs-Smith; R P Troiano; A F Subar
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessment of mineral intake in the diets of Polish postmenopausal women in relation to their BMI-the RAC-OST-POL study : Mineral intake in relation to BMI.

Authors:  Dominika Głąbska; Dariusz Włodarek; Aleksandra Kołota; Aleksandra Czekajło; Bogna Drozdzowska; Wojciech Pluskiewicz
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Sociodemographic, Lifestyle, Environmental and Pregnancy-Related Determinants of Dietary Patterns during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Ewelina Wesołowska; Agnieszka Jankowska; Elżbieta Trafalska; Paweł Kałużny; Mariusz Grzesiak; Jolanta Dominowska; Wojciech Hanke; Gemma Calamandrei; Kinga Polańska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Beyond bariatric surgery and weight loss medicaments. A systematic review of the current practice in obesity rehabilitative inpatient programs in adults and pediatrics.

Authors:  Daniele Spadaccini; Silvia Guazzotti; Filipa Patricia Goncalves Correia; Tommaso Daffara; Sabrina Tini; Alessandro Antonioli; Gianluca Aimaretti; Paolo Marzullo; Marina Caputo; Valentina Antoniotti; Flavia Prodam
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.