Literature DB >> 10445289

Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice.

K Reinhold1, L Engqvist, B Misof, J Kurtz.   

Abstract

As a special version of the good-genes hypothesis, it was recently proposed that females could benefit from choosing drive-resistant males in a meiotic drive system. Here, we examine with a three-locus, six-allele population genetic model whether female choice for drive resistance can evolve. An allele leading to female preference for drive-resistant males was introduced at low frequency into a population polymorphic for meiotic drive and drive resistance. Our simulations show that female choice of drive-resistant males is disadvantageous when resistance is Y-linked. This disadvantage occurs because, at equilibrium, drive-resistant males have lower reproductive success than drive-susceptible males. Thus, female choice of drive-susceptible males can evolve when resistance is Y-linked. When resistance is autosomal, selection on female choice for drive resistance is less strong and depends on the frequency of choice: female preference of resistant males is favoured when choice is rare and disadvantageous when choice is frequent, leading to a stable equilibrium at a low frequency of the choice allele. Independent of the location of drive resistance alleles, males with the non-driving allele always have above average reproductive success. Female choice is therefore beneficial when choosy females prefer males with the non-driving allele.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10445289      PMCID: PMC1690076          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  14 in total

1.  Genes that violate Mendel's rules.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 2.142

2.  Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of the "Sex-Ratio" Polymorphism in DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.

Authors:  J W Curtsinger; M W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Selfish genes and meiotic drive.

Authors:  L D Hurst
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Virility Deficiency and the Sex-Ratio Trait in DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA. I. Sperm Displacement and Sexual Selection.

Authors:  C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Polymorphism for Y-linked suppressors of sex-ratio in two natural populations of Drosophila mediopunctata.

Authors:  A B Carvalho; S C Vaz; L B Klaczko
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Meiotic drive and unisexual hybrid sterility: a comment.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; J A Coyne; H A Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Extraordinary sex ratios. A sex-ratio theory for sex linkage and inbreeding has new implications in cytogenetics and entomology.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Sex chromosome meiotic drive in stalk-eyed flies.

Authors:  D C Presgraves; E Severance; G S Wilkinson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Fitness reduction associated with the deletion of a satellite DNA array.

Authors:  C I Wu; J R True; N Johnson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Experimental population genetics of meiotic drive systems. I. Pseudo-Y chromosomal drive as a means of eliminating cage populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T W Lyttle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  5 in total

1.  Male killing can select for male mate choice: a novel solution to the paradox of the lek.

Authors:  J P Randerson; F M Jiggins; L D Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 3.  Selfish genetic elements and sexual selection: their impact on male fertility.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 4.  Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nikolai Windbichler; Robert L Unckless; Andreas Sutter; Jan-Niklas Runge; Perran A Ross; Andrew Pomiankowski; Nicole L Nuckolls; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Nicole Mideo; Oliver Y Martin; Andri Manser; Mathieu Legros; Amanda M Larracuente; Luke Holman; John Godwin; Neil Gemmell; Cécile Courret; Anna Buchman; Luke G Barrett; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Not just a theory--the utility of mathematical models in evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; Yaniv Brandvain; Sumit Dhole; Courtney L Fitzpatrick; Emma E Goldberg; Caitlin A Stern; Jeremy Van Cleve; D Justin Yeh
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 8.029

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.