Literature DB >> 2506453

Fitness reduction associated with the deletion of a satellite DNA array.

C I Wu1, J R True, N Johnson.   

Abstract

Satellite DNA refers to a class of tandem repeats of very simple sequences, usually A + T or G + C rich, which form a satellite band on a CsCl gradient. Their ubiquity and abundance in higher eukaryotes have led to speculation about their functions. It has often been suggested that satellite DNAs are merely innocuous genetic parasites or comprise 'junk' DNA. The recent identification of an array of satellite DNA repeats as the Responder (Rsp) locus of Drosophila melanogaster provides a new perspective on these elements. Rsp is in the centromeric heterochromatin of most natural second chromosomes. It causes spermatids bearing it to degenerate after meiosis when the homologous second chromosome is a Segregation Distorter (SD) chromosome. That is, SD targets the Rsp locus on its homologue for destruction during spermatogenesis, causing meiotic drive. Why then does the Rsp locus, a large array of satellite repeats, exist at all? One plausible explanation is that its existence contributes to the fitness of flies bearing it, compensating for the loss through meiotic drive. A direct demonstration of the usefulness of any family of satellite DNA is to compare the fitnesses of individuals with and without it. Previously, such an experiment has been difficult because the absence of a characteristic phenotype has precluded an efficient selection of deletion mutations. In this report we attempt to demonstrate a fitness reduction associated with the deletion of Rsp satellite DNA as well as the life stages at which such a reduction occurs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2506453     DOI: 10.1038/341248a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  20 in total

1.  Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice.

Authors:  K Reinhold; L Engqvist; B Misof; J Kurtz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Fitness effect analysis of a heterochromatic supernumerary segment in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans.

Authors:  F Perfectti; J Cabrero; M D López-León; E Muñoz; M C Pardo; J P Camacho
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Four distinct alpha satellite subfamilies shared by human chromosomes 13, 14 and 21.

Authors:  B Vissel; K H Choo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  A surrogate approach to study the evolution of noncoding DNA elements that organize eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Danielle Vermaak; Joshua J Bayes; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Stability of tandem repeats in the Drosophila melanogaster Hsr-omega nuclear RNA.

Authors:  N C Hogan; F Slot; K L Traverse; J C Garbe; W G Bendena; M L Pardue
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Rapid evolution of a coadapted gene complex: evidence from the Segregation Distorter (SD) system of meiotic drive in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M F Palopoli; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster: genomic organization of Responder sequences.

Authors:  R Moschetti; R Caizzi; S Pimpinelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Low frequency of mouse t haplotypes in wild populations is not explained by modifiers of meiotic drive.

Authors:  K G Ardlie; L M Silver
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A Pooled Sequencing Approach Identifies a Candidate Meiotic Driver in Drosophila.

Authors:  Kevin H-C Wei; Hemakumar M Reddy; Chandramouli Rathnam; Jimin Lee; Deanna Lin; Shuqing Ji; James M Mason; Andrew G Clark; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  The selfish Segregation Distorter gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Amanda M Larracuente; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.