Literature DB >> 12647560

Pragmatic versus form-based accounts of referential contrast: evidence for effects of informativity expectations.

Julie C Sedivy1.   

Abstract

Characterizing the relationship between form-based linguistic knowledge and representation of context has long been of importance in the study of on-line language processing. Recent experimental research has shown evidence of very rapid effects of referential context in resolving local indeterminacies on-line. However, there has been no consensus regarding the nature of these context effects. The current paper summarizes recent work covering a range of phenomena for which referential contrast has been shown to influence on-line processing, including prenominal and post-nominal modification, focus operators, and intonational focus. The results of the body of work suggest that referential context effects are not limited to situations in which the linguistic form of the utterance directly specifies the point of contact with context. Rather, context effects of a pragmatic, Gricean nature appear to be possible, suggesting the relationship between linguistic form and context in rapid on-line processing can be of a very indirect nature.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12647560     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021928914454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  7 in total

1.  Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation.

Authors:  J C Sedivy; M K Tanenhaus; C G Chambers; G N Carlson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-06-22

Review 2.  On the pragmatics of contrast.

Authors:  E V Clark
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1990-06

3.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing.

Authors:  G Altmann; M Steedman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-12

4.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.

Authors:  G T Altmann; Y Kamide
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

5.  Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; M J Spivey-Knowlton; K M Eberhard; J C Sedivy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts.

Authors:  K M Eberhard; M J Spivey-Knowlton; J C Sedivy; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11

7.  Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  D Dahan; J S Magnuson; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.468

  7 in total
  34 in total

Review 1.  Language processing in the natural world.

Authors:  Michael K Tanenhaus; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Lexical interference effects in sentence processing: evidence from the visual world paradigm and self-organizing models.

Authors:  Anuenue Kukona; Pyeong Whan Cho; James S Magnuson; Whitney Tabor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  A new experimental paradigm to study children's processing of their parent's unscripted language input.

Authors:  Sudha Arunachalam
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts.

Authors:  Jennifer Arnold; Zenzi M Griffin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

6.  The director task: A test of Theory-of-Mind use or selective attention?

Authors:  Paula Rubio-Fernández
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

7.  Implementing a concept network model.

Authors:  Sarah H Solomon; John D Medaglia; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-08

8.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  What's learned together stays together: speakers' choice of referring expression reflects shared experience.

Authors:  Kristen S Gorman; Whitney Gegg-Harrison; Chelsea R Marsh; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Interactive processing of contrastive expressions by Russian children.

Authors:  Irina A Sekerina; John C Trueswell
Journal:  First Lang       Date:  2012-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.