Literature DB >> 10434021

Cell division transforms mutagenic lesions into deletion-recombinagenic lesions in yeast cells.

A Galli1, R H Schiestl.   

Abstract

Cell proliferation has been recognized as an important factor in human and experimental carcinogenesis. Point mutations as well as larger chromosomal rearrangements are involved in the initiation of cancer. In this paper we compared the relative potencies of radiation and chemical carcinogens for inducing point mutations vs. deletions in cell cycle arrested with dividing cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Point mutation substrates and deletion (DEL) recombination substrates were constructed with the genes CDC28 and TUB2 that are required for cell cycle progression through G1 and G2, respectively. The carcinogens ionizing radiation, UV, MMS, EMS and 4-NQO induced point mutations in G1 and in G2 arrested as well as in dividing cells. UV, MMS, EMS and 4-NQO caused very weak if any increases in DEL recombination in G1 or G2 arrested cells, but large increases in dividing cells. When cells treated with carcinogen either in G1 or G2 were allowed to progress through the cell cycle, a time-dependent increase in DEL recombination was seen. Ionizing radiation and the site-specific endonuclease I-SceI, which both directly create double-strand breaks, induced DEL recombination in G1 as well as in G2 arrested cells. In conclusion, UV-, MMS-, EMS- and 4-NQO-induced DNA damage was converted during DNA replication to a lesion capable of inducing DEL recombination which is probably a DNA strand break. Thus, cell proliferation is not necessary to turn DNA alkylation or UV damage into a mutagenic lesion but to convert the damage into a lesion that induces DNA deletions. These results are discussed with respect to mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Copyright 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10434021     DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(99)00097-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  23 in total

1.  DNA glycosylase activity and cell proliferation are key factors in modulating homologous recombination in vivo.

Authors:  Orsolya Kiraly; Guanyu Gong; Megan D Roytman; Yoshiyuki Yamada; Leona D Samson; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast.

Authors:  Jong Sook Ahn; Fekret Osman; Matthew C Whitby
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Understanding the origins of UV-induced recombination through manipulation of sister chromatid cohesion.

Authors:  Shay Covo; Wenjian Ma; James W Westmoreland; Dmitry A Gordenin; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Expression of cancer related BRCA1 missense variants decreases MMS-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae without altering its nuclear localization.

Authors:  Samuele Lodovichi; Martina Vitello; Tiziana Cervelli; Alvaro Galli
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  From the Cover: mitotic gene conversion events induced in G1-synchronized yeast cells by gamma rays are similar to spontaneous conversion events.

Authors:  Phoebe S Lee; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genome-wide variation of the somatic mutation frequency in transgenic plants.

Authors:  I Kovalchuk; O Kovalchuk; B Hohn
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  The yeast Xrs2 complex functions in S phase checkpoint regulation.

Authors:  D D'Amours; S P Jackson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Characterization of the hyperrecombination phenotype of the pol3-t mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Alvaro Galli; Tiziana Cervelli; Robert H Schiestl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Daisuke Nakada; Kunihiro Matsumoto; Katsunori Sugimoto
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  The pol3-t hyperrecombination phenotype and DNA damage-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is RAD50 dependent.

Authors:  Alvaro Galli; Kurt Hafer; Tiziana Cervelli; Robert H Schiestl
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.