Literature DB >> 10433351

Comparative safety and tolerability of angiotensin II receptor antagonists.

L Mazzolai1, M Burnier.   

Abstract

Hypertension is a very common disease and represents a major risk factor for cardiovascular adverse events such as stroke and heart failure. In recent years, a big effort has been put into detecting and treating patients with hypertension. Several classes of drugs acting by different pharmacological mechanisms can be chosen for the treatment of hypertension. However, the long term use of all anti-hypertensive agents is sometimes limited by the occurrence of adverse effects. Thanks to continuous pharmacological research, new compounds are regularly developed and become available in clinical practice. Recently, several new, nonpeptide, orally active angiotensin II receptor antagonists have reached the market. Today, these substances represent the most specific way to block the renin angiotensin system. Numerous studies have now demonstrated that these angiotensin II antagonists are as effective as ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, beta-blockers or diuretics in lowering blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Given the increasing use of angiotensin II receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension, it is important to review their safety and tolerability. Based on the actual level of knowledge, the striking feature of this class of agents is their favourable safety and tolerability profile which appears to be equivalent to that observed with placebo. Indeed, so far, no clear class-specific adverse effect has been attributed to the angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Thus, if angiotensin II antagonists prevent target organ damage and reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients with hypertension, they may well become a first-line treatment of hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10433351     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199921010-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  78 in total

1.  Renal impairment associated with losartan.

Authors:  D R Saine; E R Ahrens
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Losartan versus ramipril in the treatment of postrenal transplant erythrocytosis.

Authors:  L Hortal; A Fernández; N Vega; J C Rodríguez; A Losada; M Lorenzo; C Plaza; L Palop
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 3.  Cough and angioneurotic edema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. A review of the literature and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Z H Israili; W D Hall
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Angiotensin II receptor antagonists - antihypertensive agents.

Authors:  M Burnier; H R Brunner
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.206

5.  Pharmacokinetics of valsartan in patients with liver disease.

Authors:  L J Brookman; P E Rolan; I S Benjamin; K R Palmer; P J Wyld; P Lloyd; G Flesch; F Waldmeier; A Sioufi; F Mullins
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Is the antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition mediated by interference in the renin-angiotensin system?

Authors:  R T Gansevoort; D de Zeeuw; P E de Jong
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Losartan in heart failure. Hemodynamic effects and tolerability. Losartan Hemodynamic Study Group.

Authors:  I Crozier; H Ikram; N Awan; J Cleland; N Stephen; K Dickstein; M Frey; J Young; G Klinger; L Makris
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Effects of losartan on a background of hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  B A Soffer; J T Wright; J H Pratt; B Wiens; A I Goldberg; C S Sweet
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  The angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists. A new class of antihypertensive drugs.

Authors:  J H Bauer; G P Reams
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-07-10

10.  Drug induced acute pancreatitis: incidence and severity.

Authors:  P G Lankisch; M Dröge; F Gottesleben
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  15 in total

1.  Drug points: Dysgeusia and burning mouth syndrome by eprosartan.

Authors:  Xavier Castells; Isidre Rodoreda; Consuelo Pedrós; Gloria Cereza; Joan-Ramon Laporte
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-30

2.  Safety and tolerability of an olmesartan medoxomil-based regimen in patients with stage 1 hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Desirable therapeutic characteristics of an optimal antihypertensive agent.

Authors:  Lisa Mustone Alexander
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Irbesartan: a review of its use in hypertension and in the management of diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Katherine F Croom; Monique P Curran; Karen L Goa; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  Hans R Brunner; Klaus O Stumpe; Andrzej Januszewicz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension.

Authors:  S Oparil; D Williams; S G Chrysant; T C Marbury; J Neutel
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Antihypertensive efficacy of candesartan-lisinopril in combination vs. up-titration of lisinopril: the AMAZE trials.

Authors:  Joseph L Izzo; Marc S Weinberg; James W Hainer; Joseph Kerkering; Conrad K P Tou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Azilsartan in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Using Clinic and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements.

Authors:  Alfonso Perez; Charlie Cao
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  The Impact of Azilsartan Medoxomil Treatment (Capsule Formulation) at Doses Ranging From 10 to 80 mg: Significant, Rapid Reductions in Clinic Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Alfonso Perez; Charlie Cao
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, as assessed by ambulatory blood pressure measurements.

Authors:  Joel M Neutel; William J Elliott; Joseph L Izzo; Chao L Chen; Harvey N Masonson
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.