Literature DB >> 8196289

Is the antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition mediated by interference in the renin-angiotensin system?

R T Gansevoort1, D de Zeeuw, P E de Jong.   

Abstract

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition causes specific renal effects, such as a rise in effective renal plasma flow, a fall in filtration fraction and a lowering of proteinuria. The mechanism of these renal effects is still debated. Recent animal studies suggest that non-angiotensin (Ang) II related actions of ACE inhibition, such as bradykinin accumulation, may have a role. We therefore investigated the effects of specific intervention in the renin-angiotensin system with the Ang II receptor antagonist losartan, and compared these effects to those obtained with ACE inhibition, as this comparison might resolve the question whether or not the effects of ACE inhibition are Ang II related. The effects of losartan and enalapril were studied in eleven patients with non-diabetic proteinuria and hypertension. The protocol consisted of seven periods, each lasting one month, in which patients received once daily placebo, 50 mg losartan, 100 mg losartan, placebo, 10 mg enalapril, 20 mg enalapril, and placebo, respectively. At the end of each study period proteinuria, blood pressure, and renal function were determined. On both doses of losartan and enalapril proteinuria and blood pressure fell, whereas ERPF increased and GFR remained stable. The fall in urinary protein excretion was similar for both drugs: 46.3% (28.3% to 63.1%) on 100 mg losartan versus 51.6% (37.0% to 69.2%) on 20 mg enalapril (expressed as Wilcoxon-based estimated median with 95% CI).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8196289     DOI: 10.1038/ki.1994.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  23 in total

1.  [Therapy of chronic cardiac insufficiency with ACE inhibitors versus AT1 receptor antagonists. Is there a difference?].

Authors:  B Schieffer; H Drexler
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  ACE inhibitors and proteinuria.

Authors:  R T Gansevoort; D de Zeeuw; P E de Jong
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1996-12

Review 3.  A risk-benefit assessment of losartan potassium in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  L M Burrell
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  ACE inhibitors and the kidney. A risk-benefit assessment.

Authors:  G Navis; H J Faber; D de Zeeuw; P E de Jong
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Variability in response to albuminuria-lowering drugs: true or random?

Authors:  Sergei I Petrykiv; Dick de Zeeuw; Frederik Persson; Peter Rossing; Ron T Gansevoort; Gozewijn D Laverman; Hiddo J L Heerspink
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Renal protection and antihypertensive drugs: current status.

Authors:  A Salvetti; P Mattei; I Sudano
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Adverse drug reactions: more than a warning!

Authors:  L de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1995-11-24

Review 8.  Angiotensin receptor blockers in diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  D A Price; N K Hollenberg
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  Additive antiproteinuric effect of enalapril and losartan in children with hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Authors:  María Gracia Caletti; Alejandro Balestracci; Mabel Missoni; Clarisa Vezzani
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Role of remission clinics in the longitudinal treatment of CKD.

Authors:  Piero Ruggenenti; Elena Perticucci; Paolo Cravedi; Vincenzo Gambara; Marco Costantini; Sanjib Kumar Sharma; Annalisa Perna; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.