Literature DB >> 27421242

Azilsartan in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Using Clinic and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements.

Alfonso Perez1, Charlie Cao1.   

Abstract

This was a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind dose-ranging study. Hypertensive adults (n=555) received one of five doses of azilsartan (AZL; 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 mg), olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) 20 mg, or placebo once daily. The primary endpoint was change in trough clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at week 8. Compared with placebo, all AZL doses (except 2.5 mg) provided statistically and clinically significant reductions in DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) based on both clinic blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). AZL 40 mg was statistically superior vs OLM. Clinic BP was associated with a pronounced placebo effect (-6 mm Hg), whereas this was negligible with ABPM (±0.5 mm Hg). Adverse event frequency was similar in the AZL and placebo groups. Based on these and other findings, subsequent trials investigated the commercial AZL medoxomil tablet at doses 20 to 80 mg/d using 24-hour ABPM. ©2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27421242      PMCID: PMC8030785          DOI: 10.1111/jch.12873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  14 in total

1.  Divergent results using clinic and ambulatory blood pressures: report of a darusentan-resistant hypertension trial.

Authors:  George L Bakris; Lars H Lindholm; Henry R Black; Henry Krum; Stuart Linas; Jennifer V Linseman; Sarah Arterburn; Philip Sager; Michael Weber
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.

Authors:  William B White; Michael A Weber; Domenic Sica; George L Bakris; Alfonso Perez; Charlie Cao; Stuart Kupfer
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement in clinical practice and research: a critical review of a technique in need of implementation.

Authors:  E O'Brien
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Comparative safety and tolerability of angiotensin II receptor antagonists.

Authors:  L Mazzolai; M Burnier
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  A systematic comparison of the properties of clinically used angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Martin C Michel; Carolyn Foster; Hans R Brunner; Lisheng Liu
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 6.  Angiotensin receptor blockers: pharmacology, efficacy, and safety.

Authors:  Addison A Taylor; Helmy Siragy; Shawna Nesbitt
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Domenic Sica; William B White; Michael A Weber; George L Bakris; Alfonso Perez; Charlie Cao; Alison Handley; Stuart Kupfer
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  A current evaluation of the safety of angiotensin receptor blockers and direct renin inhibitors.

Authors:  Helmy M Siragy
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2011-05-19

Review 9.  Differential pharmacology and benefit/risk of azilsartan compared to other sartans.

Authors:  Theodore W Kurtz; Takashi Kajiya
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-02-28

10.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study.

Authors:  Hiromi Rakugi; Kazuaki Enya; Kenkichi Sugiura; Yoshinori Ikeda
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.872

View more
  5 in total

1.  Improvement of Diurnal Blood Pressure Variation by Azilsartan.

Authors:  Keisuke Okamura; Kazuyuki Shirai; Tetsu Okuda; Hidenori Urata
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2017-12-01

2.  Pharmacokinetics of a Single Dose of Azilsartan in Pediatric Patients: A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kazuaki Enya; Ben T Saji; Takuya Kato; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Emiko Koumura
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil combined with chlorthalidone.

Authors:  Michael A Weber; Peter Sever; Attila Juhasz; Andrew Roberts; Charlie Cao
Journal:  J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Safety and efficacy of azilsartan in paediatric patients with hypertension: a phase 3, single-arm, open-label, prospective study.

Authors:  Shuichi Ito; Yuya Nishiyama; Kenkichi Sugiura; Kazuaki Enya
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.801

5.  Azilsartan in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Using Clinic and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements.

Authors:  Alfonso Perez; Charlie Cao
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.