Literature DB >> 27558280

The Impact of Azilsartan Medoxomil Treatment (Capsule Formulation) at Doses Ranging From 10 to 80 mg: Significant, Rapid Reductions in Clinic Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure.

Alfonso Perez1, Charlie Cao1.   

Abstract

In this phase 2, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, dose-ranging study, hypertensive adults (n=449) were randomized to receive one of five doses of a capsule formulation of azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M; 5, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg), olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) 20 mg, or placebo once daily. The primary endpoint was change in trough clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at week 8. AZL-M provided rapid statistically and clinically significant reductions in DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) vs placebo at all doses except 5 mg. Placebo-subtracted changes were greatest with the 40 mg dose (DBP, -5.7 mm Hg; SBP, -12.3 mm Hg). Clinic changes with AZL-M (all doses) were statistically indistinguishable vs OLM, although there were greater reductions with AZL-M 40 mg using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. Adverse event frequency was similar in the AZL-M and placebo groups. Based on these and other findings, subsequent trials investigated the commercial AZL-M tablet in the dose range of 20 to 80 mg/d. ©2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27558280      PMCID: PMC8031072          DOI: 10.1111/jch.12895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  30 in total

1.  Discontinuation of antihypertensive drugs due to adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S D Ross; K S Akhras; S Zhang; M Rozinsky; L Nalysnyk
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 2.  Azilsartan medoxomil: a review of its use in hypertension.

Authors:  Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement in clinical practice and research: a critical review of a technique in need of implementation.

Authors:  E O'Brien
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).

Authors:  Paul A James; Suzanne Oparil; Barry L Carter; William C Cushman; Cheryl Dennison-Himmelfarb; Joel Handler; Daniel T Lackland; Michael L LeFevre; Thomas D MacKenzie; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Sandra J Taler; Raymond R Townsend; Jackson T Wright; Andrew S Narva; Eduardo Ortiz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Azilsartan medoxomil: a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist for treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  William L Baker; William B White
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic evaluation and clinical utility of azilsartan medoxomil for the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Fabio Angeli; Paolo Verdecchia; Chiara Pascucci; Cristina Poltronieri; Gianpaolo Reboldi
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 7.  Dose-response characteristics of olmesartan medoxomil and other angiotensin receptor antagonists.

Authors:  David H G Smith
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.571

Review 8.  Differential pharmacology and benefit/risk of azilsartan compared to other sartans.

Authors:  Theodore W Kurtz; Takashi Kajiya
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-02-28

9.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study.

Authors:  Hiromi Rakugi; Kazuaki Enya; Kenkichi Sugiura; Yoshinori Ikeda
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.872

10.  Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people.

Authors:  Eleni Rapsomaniki; Adam Timmis; Julie George; Mar Pujades-Rodriguez; Anoop D Shah; Spiros Denaxas; Ian R White; Mark J Caulfield; John E Deanfield; Liam Smeeth; Bryan Williams; Aroon Hingorani; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Single-Center Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of the Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist Azilsartan Medoxomil in Mild to Moderate Hepatic Impairment.

Authors:  Caroline Dudkowski; Aziz Karim; Zhen Zhao; Alberto B Alonso; Dyal Garg; Richard A Preston
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.126

2.  A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil combined with chlorthalidone.

Authors:  Michael A Weber; Peter Sever; Attila Juhasz; Andrew Roberts; Charlie Cao
Journal:  J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  The Impact of Azilsartan Medoxomil Treatment (Capsule Formulation) at Doses Ranging From 10 to 80 mg: Significant, Rapid Reductions in Clinic Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Alfonso Perez; Charlie Cao
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji-Guang Wang; Miao Zhang; Ying-Qing Feng; Chang-Sheng Ma; Tzung-Dau Wang; Zhi-Ming Zhu; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.