Literature DB >> 10430575

Genetic analysis of the bacteriophage T4-encoded cochaperonin Gp31.

A Richardson1, C Georgopoulos.   

Abstract

Previous genetic and biochemical analyses have established that the bacteriophage T4-encoded Gp31 is a cochaperonin that interacts with Escherichia coli's GroEL to ensure the timely and accurate folding of Gp23, the bacteriophage-encoded major capsid protein. The heptameric Gp31 cochaperonin, like the E. coli GroES cochaperonin, interacts with GroEL primarily through its unstructured mobile loop segment. Upon binding to GroEL, the mobile loop adopts a structured, beta-hairpin turn. In this article, we present extensive genetic data that strongly substantiate and extend these biochemical studies. These studies begin with the isolation of mutations in gene 31 based on the ability to plaque on groEL44 mutant bacteria, whose mutant product interacts weakly with Gp31. Our genetic system is unique because it also allows for the direct selection of revertants of such gene 31 mutations, based on their ability to plaque on groEL515 mutant bacteria. Interestingly, all of these revertants are pseudorevertants because the original 31 mutation is maintained. In addition, we show that the classical tsA70 mutation in gene 31 changes a conserved hydrophobic residue in the mobile loop to a hydrophilic one. Pseudorevertants of tsA70, which enable growth at the restrictive temperatures, acquire the same mutation previously shown to allow plaque formation on groEL44 mutant bacteria. Our genetic analyses highlight the crucial importance of all three highly conserved hydrophobic residues of the mobile loop of Gp31 in the productive interaction with GroEL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10430575      PMCID: PMC1460690     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  35 in total

1.  Interplay of structure and disorder in cochaperonin mobile loops.

Authors:  S J Landry; A Taher; C Georgopoulos; S M van der Vies
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Efficient random mutagenesis method with adjustable mutation frequency by use of PCR and dITP.

Authors:  J H Spee; W M de Vos; O P Kuipers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 A resolution.

Authors:  J F Hunt; A J Weaver; S J Landry; L Gierasch; J Deisenhofer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Conserved sequence motifs in bacterial and bacteriophage chaperonins.

Authors:  E V Koonin; S M van der Vies
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 13.807

5.  Folding in vivo of bacterial cytoplasmic proteins: role of GroEL.

Authors:  A L Horwich; K B Low; W A Fenton; I N Hirshfield; K Furtak
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-09-10       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  A new set of useful cloning and expression vectors derived from pBlueScript.

Authors:  M P Mayer
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1995-09-22       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Sequence analysis and phenotypic characterization of groEL mutations that block lambda and T4 bacteriophage growth.

Authors:  J Zeilstra-Ryalls; O Fayet; L Baird; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Bacteriophage T4 encodes a co-chaperonin that can substitute for Escherichia coli GroES in protein folding.

Authors:  S M van der Vies; A A Gatenby; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Trigger factor is involved in GroEL-dependent protein degradation in Escherichia coli and promotes binding of GroEL to unfolded proteins.

Authors:  O Kandror; M Sherman; M Rhode; A L Goldberg
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Genomic polymorphism in the T-even bacteriophages.

Authors:  F Repoila; F Tétart; J Y Bouet; H M Krisch
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Bacteriophage T4 genome.

Authors:  Eric S Miller; Elizabeth Kutter; Gisela Mosig; Fumio Arisaka; Takashi Kunisawa; Wolfgang Rüger
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Allosteric differences dictate GroEL complementation of E. coli.

Authors:  Jared Sivinski; Duc Ngo; Christopher J Zerio; Andrew J Ambrose; Edmond R Watson; Lynn K Kaneko; Marius M Kostelic; Mckayla Stevens; Anne-Marie Ray; Yangshin Park; Chunxiang Wu; Michael T Marty; Quyen Q Hoang; Donna D Zhang; Gabriel C Lander; Steven M Johnson; Eli Chapman
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  GroEL2 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Reveals the Importance of Structural Pliability in Chaperonin Function.

Authors:  Neeraja Chilukoti; C M Santosh Kumar; Shekhar C Mande
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  An ORFan no more: the bacteriophage T4 39.2 gene product, NwgI, modulates GroEL chaperone function.

Authors:  Debbie Ang; Costa Georgopoulos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Markov propagation of allosteric effects in biomolecular systems: application to GroEL-GroES.

Authors:  Chakra Chennubhotla; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 11.429

6.  Distinct Stabilities of the Structurally Homologous Heptameric Co-Chaperonins GroES and gp31.

Authors:  Andrey Dyachenko; Sem Tamara; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.109

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.