Literature DB >> 26553853

GroEL2 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Reveals the Importance of Structural Pliability in Chaperonin Function.

Neeraja Chilukoti1, C M Santosh Kumar2, Shekhar C Mande3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Intracellular protein folding is mediated by molecular chaperones, the best studied among which are the chaperonins GroEL and GroES. Conformational changes and allosteric transitions between different metastable states are hallmarks of the chaperonin mechanism. These conformational transitions between three structural domains of GroEL are anchored at two hinges. Although hinges are known to be critical for mediating the communication between different domains of GroEL, the relative importance of hinges on GroEL oligomeric assembly, ATPase activity, conformational changes, and functional activity is not fully characterized. We have exploited the inability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL2 to functionally complement an Escherichia coli groEL mutant to address the importance of hinge residues in the GroEL mechanism. Various chimeras of M. tuberculosis GroEL2 and E. coli GroEL allowed us to understand the role of hinges and dissect the consequences of oligomerization and substrate binding capability on conformational transitions. The present study explains the concomitant conformational changes observed with GroEL hinge variants and is best supported by the normal mode analysis. IMPORTANCE: Conformational changes and allosteric transitions are hallmarks of the chaperonin mechanism. We have exploited the inability of M. tuberculosis GroEL2 to functionally complement a strain of E. coli in which groEL expression is repressed to address the importance of hinges. The significance of conservation at the hinge regions stands out as a prominent feature of the GroEL mechanism in binding to GroES and substrate polypeptides. The hinge residues play a significant role in the chaperonin activity in vivo and in vitro.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26553853      PMCID: PMC4719451          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00844-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  45 in total

1.  The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity.

Authors:  L Chen; P B Sigler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL.

Authors:  J Ma; P B Sigler; Z Xu; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Binding of chaperonins.

Authors:  H Saibil; Z Dong; S Wood; A auf der Mauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-09-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Identification of important amino acid residues that modulate binding of Escherichia coli GroEL to its various cochaperones.

Authors:  G Klein; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Identification of a second Escherichia coli groE gene whose product is necessary for bacteriophage morphogenesis.

Authors:  K Tilly; H Murialdo; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  From minichaperone to GroEL 3: properties of an active single-ring mutant of GroEL.

Authors:  J Chatellier; F Hill; N W Foster; P Goloubinoff; A R Fersht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures.

Authors:  O Fayet; T Ziegelhoffer; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL homologues unusually exist as lower oligomers and retain the ability to suppress aggregation of substrate proteins.

Authors:  Rohini Qamra; Volety Srinivas; Shekhar C Mande
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Sequence analysis and phenotypic characterization of groEL mutations that block lambda and T4 bacteriophage growth.

Authors:  J Zeilstra-Ryalls; O Fayet; L Baird; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Dissection of the heat-shock response in Mycobacterium tuberculosis using mutants and microarrays.

Authors:  Graham R Stewart; Lorenz Wernisch; Richard Stabler; Joseph A Mangan; Jason Hinds; Ken G Laing; Douglas B Young; Philip D Butcher
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.777

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL2 Modulates Dendritic Cell Responses.

Authors:  Jonathan Kevin Sia; Erica Bizzell; Maria Georgieva; Ranjna Madan-Lala; Jyothi Rengarajan
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Allosteric differences dictate GroEL complementation of E. coli.

Authors:  Jared Sivinski; Duc Ngo; Christopher J Zerio; Andrew J Ambrose; Edmond R Watson; Lynn K Kaneko; Marius M Kostelic; Mckayla Stevens; Anne-Marie Ray; Yangshin Park; Chunxiang Wu; Michael T Marty; Quyen Q Hoang; Donna D Zhang; Gabriel C Lander; Steven M Johnson; Eli Chapman
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Functional Differences between E. coli and ESKAPE Pathogen GroES/GroEL.

Authors:  Jared Sivinski; Andrew J Ambrose; Iliya Panfilenko; Christopher J Zerio; Jason M Machulis; Niloufar Mollasalehi; Lynn K Kaneko; Mckayla Stevens; Anne-Marie Ray; Yangshin Park; Chunxiang Wu; Quyen Q Hoang; Steven M Johnson; Eli Chapman
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 4.  A Glimpse Into the Structure and Function of Atypical Type I Chaperonins.

Authors:  Mohammed Y Ansari; Shekhar C Mande
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2018-04-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.