Literature DB >> 10429717

Breast cancer: computer simulation method for estimating optimal intervals for screening.

J S Michaelson1, E Halpern, D B Kopans.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a mathematic method that can be used to determine the optimal screening interval for detection of breast cancer prior to distant metastatic spread.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computer simulation was developed with the use of biologically based data from the literature on the rates of tumor growth and spread, which can be used to calculate the course of breast cancer growth and metastasis.
RESULTS: On the basis of the data available at this time, the results of the simulations suggested that a screening interval of 2 years would result in a 22% reduction in the rate of distant metastatic disease, an interval of 1 year would result in a 51% reduction, and an interval of 6 months would result in an 80% reduction.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that more frequent screening could dramatically reduce the death rate from breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10429717     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.212.2.r99au49551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

Review 1.  Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Amy B Knudsen; Chung Yin Kong; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Optimal MRI interval for detection of asymptomatic recurrence in surgically treated early cervical cancer by use of a mathematical model.

Authors:  A Laios; K Gubbala; R Lampe; A Tolis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Estimating Tumor Growth Rates In Vivo.

Authors:  Anne Talkington; Rick Durrett
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  A New Robust Method for Nonlinear Regression.

Authors:  M A Tabatabai; J J Kengwoung-Keumo; W M Eby; S Bae; U Manne; M Fouad; K P Singh
Journal:  J Biom Biostat       Date:  2014

5.  Optimal Breast Biopsy Decision-Making Based on Mammographic Features and Demographic Factors.

Authors:  Jagpreet Chhatwal; Oguzhan Alagoz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Oper Res       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.310

6.  Breast cancer and screening in American Indian and Alaska Native women.

Authors:  Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Cosimo Di Maggio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  [Radiological diagnosis of mammary carcinomas. I: pathology and x-ray mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; H-P Sinn
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Family history of cancer and its association with breast cancer risk perception and repeat mammography.

Authors:  Gillian Haber; Nasar U Ahmed; Vukosava Pekovic
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Comparison of 1- and 2-year screening intervals for women undergoing screening mammography.

Authors:  E S Wai; Y D'yachkova; I A Olivotto; S Tyldesley; N Phillips; L J Warren; A J Coldman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.