Literature DB >> 21415931

Optimal Breast Biopsy Decision-Making Based on Mammographic Features and Demographic Factors.

Jagpreet Chhatwal1, Oguzhan Alagoz, Elizabeth S Burnside.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common non-skin cancer affecting women in the United States, where every year more than 20 million mammograms are performed. Breast biopsy is commonly performed on the suspicious findings on mammograms to confirm the presence of cancer. Currently, 700,000 biopsies are performed annually in the U.S.; 55%-85% of these biopsies ultimately are found to be benign breast lesions, resulting in unnecessary treatments, patient anxiety, and expenditures. This paper addresses the decision problem faced by radiologists: When should a woman be sent for biopsy based on her mammographic features and demographic factors? This problem is formulated as a finite-horizon discrete-time Markov decision process. The optimal policy of our model shows that the decision to biopsy should take the age of patient into account; particularly, an older patient's risk threshold for biopsy should be higher than that of a younger patient. When applied to the clinical data, our model outperforms radiologists in the biopsy decision-making problem. This study also derives structural properties of the model, including sufficiency conditions that ensure the existence of a control-limit type policy and nondecreasing control-limits with age.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21415931      PMCID: PMC3057079          DOI: 10.1287/opre.1100.0877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Res        ISSN: 0030-364X            Impact factor:   3.310


  47 in total

1.  A tangled web: factors likely to affect the efficacy of screening mammography.

Authors:  C J Baines; R Dayan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-05-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS).

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Jennifer H Menell
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jonathan L Jesneck; Loren W Nolte; Jay A Baker; Carey E Floyd; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Promoting an ethical approach to unproven screening imaging tests.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Is age at diagnosis an independent prognostic factor for survival following breast cancer?

Authors:  Upali W Jayasinghe; Richard Taylor; John Boyages
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.872

7.  Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications.

Authors:  Y Jiang; R M Nishikawa; R A Schmidt; A Y Toledano; K Doi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Biopsy of occult breast lesions. Analysis of 1261 abnormalities.

Authors:  J E Meyer; T J Eberlein; P C Stomper; M R Sonnenfeld
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  V L Ernster; J Barclay; K Kerlikowske; D Grady; C Henderson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-03-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  17 in total

1.  Optimization of PSA screening policies: a comparison of the patient and societal perspectives.

Authors:  Jingyu Zhang; Brian T Denton; Hari Balasubramanian; Nilay D Shah; Brant A Inman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Simulation optimization of PSA-threshold based prostate cancer screening policies.

Authors:  Daniel J Underwood; Jingyu Zhang; Brian T Denton; Nilay D Shah; Brant A Inman
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2012-12

3.  The Effect of Budgetary Restrictions on Breast Cancer Diagnostic Decisions.

Authors:  Mehmet U S Ayvaci; Oguzhan Alagoz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Manuf Serv Oper Manag       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.600

4.  Optimal Policies for Reducing Unnecessary Follow-up Mammography Exams in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Oguzhan Alagoz; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Decis Anal       Date:  2013-09

5.  Dynamic Monitoring and Control of Irreversible Chronic Diseases with Application to Glaucoma.

Authors:  Pooyan Kazemian; Jonathan E Helm; Mariel S Lavieri; Joshua D Stein; Mark P Van Oyen
Journal:  Prod Oper Manag       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Optimal timing of joint replacement using mathematical programming and stochastic programming models.

Authors:  Baruch Keren; Joseph S Pliskin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2011-07-12

7.  Opportunities for Operations Research in Medical Decision Making.

Authors:  Sait Tunc; Oguzhan Alagoz; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  IEEE Intell Syst       Date:  2014 May-June       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Breast cancer risk prediction and mammography biopsy decisions: a model-based study.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Elizabeth A Handorf; Jinbo Chen; Mirar N Bristol Demeter
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Initial management strategies for follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  Qiushi Chen; Turgay Ayer; Loretta J Nastoupil; Miray Seward; Hongzheng Zhang; Rajni Sinha; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2012-10

10.  Changing Cycle Lengths in State-Transition Models: Challenges and Solutions.

Authors:  Jagpreet Chhatwal; Suren Jayasuriya; Elamin H Elbasha
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.