Literature DB >> 10428222

Acetabular fracture associated with cementless acetabular component insertion: a report of 13 cases.

P F Sharkey1, W J Hozack, J J Callaghan, Y S Kim, D J Berry, A D Hanssen, D G LeWallen.   

Abstract

Acetabular fracture during insertion of a cementless acetabular component occurred in 13 patients. The preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 6 patients, rheumatoid arthritis in 2 patients, avascular necrosis in 3 patients, hip fracture nonunion in 1 patient, and developmental dysplasia of the hip in 1 patient. Several different components were used; however, the acetabulum was underreamed by 1 to 3 mm in all cases. The acetabular fracture was identified in 9 of 13 cases intraoperatively. The fracture was identified on postoperative radiographs for the other 4 cases. Fractures were treated by a variety of means, including the addition of augmentation screws in or around the cup, use of autograft bone at the fracture site, modified postoperative weight-bearing status, and immobilization. In 2 cases, the socket needed to be revised after it progressively migrated and failed. One patient had cup migration, and another had a radiolucent line about the cup but was not symptomatic enough to require revision. In 3 of these 4 cases, the fracture was not identified intraoperatively. Underreaming of the acetabulum and use of an oversized acetabular component has been recommended to improve the initial stability of the acetabular component during total hip arthroplasty. Impaction of an oversized component requires bone to undergo plastic deformation if the cup is to be fully seated. Theoretically, this technique provides improved component stability with enhanced osseous ingrowth into the cup. The 13 cases reported in this study demonstrate that acetabular fracture is a complication that may occur in association with uncemented hip arthroplasty, particularly if oversized components are used. The importance of recognizing acetabular fractures intraoperatively and the need to institute appropriate treatment to ensure a stable acetabular component is emphasized. In patients with osteoporotic bone, line-to-line reaming with use of a cementless acetabular component or insertion of a cemented socket may be considered to avoid this significant complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10428222     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90097-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  26 in total

Review 1.  Treatment algorithm of acetabular periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Paul Simon; Philipp von Roth; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Francesco Benazzo; Mario Formagnana; Marco Bargagliotti; Loris Perticarini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Amol Chitre; Henry Wynn Jones; Nikhil Shah; Anthony Clayson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12

4.  Relationship between Wiberg's lateral center edge angle, Lequesne's acetabular index, and medial acetabular bone stock.

Authors:  Clément M L Werner; Carol E Copeland; Thomas Ruckstuhl; Jeff Stromberg; Clifford H Turen; Samy Bouaicha
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  [Osteosynthesis and cup revision in periprosthetic acetabulum fractures using a Kocher-Langenbeck approach].

Authors:  P Schwabe; S Märdian; C Perka; K-D Schaser
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 6.  [Importance of revision- and tumor-endoprosthetics in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the lower extremity].

Authors:  P M Prodinger; N Harrasser; C Suren; F Pohlig; H Mühlhofer; J Schauwecker; R von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  [Periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty : classification, diagnosis and therapy strategies].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; P M Prodinger; M Hoberg; R Meffert; M Rudert; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saqeb B Mirza; Douglas G Dunlop; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Syed G Naqvi; Shafat Gangoo; Saif Salih
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-05-11

9.  Protrusio After Medial Acetabular Wall Breach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Anneliese D Heiner; Thomas E Baer; Andrew J Pugely; Nicolas O Noiseux
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

Review 10.  [Periprosthetic fractures following total hip and knee arthroplasty: Risk factors, epidemiological aspects, diagnostics and classification systems].

Authors:  M Fuchs; C Perka; P von Roth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.